REPORT OF THE NINTH MEETING OF THE COORDINATORS OF THE EUROPEAN SYSTEM OF COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORKS IN AGRICULTURE (ESCORENA)

held in
GRIGNON, FRANCE, 23 - 25 NOVEMBER 2000






CONTENTS

REPORT OF THE NINTH MEETING OF THE COORDINATORS OF THE EUROPEAN SYSTEM OF COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORKS IN AGRICULTURE (ESCORENA)

REPORT OF COOPERATIVE FAO-CIHEAM NETWORK ON SHEEP AND GOATS

REPORT OF BUFFALO NETWORK

REPORT OF FAO-CIHEAM INTERREGIONAL COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORK ON NUTS

REPORT OF INTERREGIONAL RESEARCH NETWORK ON RICE

REPORT OF INTERREGIONAL RESEARCH NETWORK ON RICEREPORT OF FAO/CIHEAM INTERREGIONAL COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORK ON PASTURES AND FODDER CROPS

REPORT OF INTERREGIONAL RESEARCH NETWORK ON RICEREPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORK ON SUNFLOWER

REPORT OF INTERREGIONAL RESEARCH NETWORK ON RICEREPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORK ON FLAX AND OTHER BAST PLANTS


I. INTRODUCTION

Every four years the coordinators of all ESCORENA Networks come together to review network activities and to jointly plan the future orientation of their activities and of the whole ESCORENA system. The last meeting was held in Bella, Italy, in 1996.

The Meeting was organised by Mr Morand-Fehr, Coordinator of the Sheep and Goat Network and was held at the Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon (INA P-G). The availability of the excellent and comfortable facilities and their central geographical location for all coordinators allowed the Meeting to take place at a very reasonable cost.

All but three out of the fourteen network coordinators were present; those unable to attend were the coordinators from the Trace Elements Network; Oat Diseases Ad Hoc Working Group and no communication was received from the Olive Network. In addition, all four ERNAC members attended, as well as Mr J.-L. Multon, the alternative ESCORENA National Contact Point for France, Mr D. Gabina, Representative of CIHEAM, a co-sponsor of three networks, the two REU officers managing the ESCORENA Secretariat (one also as ERNAC member), the Officer-in-Charge of REU and the REU Information Officer, based in Paris. The Meeting was opened by the Director of INA P-G, Mr Guerin. The List of Participants is attached as Annex I.

 

II. DISCUSSIONS

The preliminary programme was adopted with minor adjustments in response to the last changes in travel arrangements for some of the coordinators (programme in Annex II). The minutes were prepared by the secretariat. Most network reports were also presented in writing and discussions from the beginning were very lively and constructive. The unedited reports are attached in Annex III.

The REU Officer-in-Charge presented the changes in the FAO structure and REU priorities and resources since 1996, as they relate to the Networks and placed particular emphasis on the expected function of the Networks in FAO's role as an agency for development. Discussions followed on the possible tools and means with which to further integrate the present networks into the field programme, open new funding avenues through collaborative agreements with professional associations, NGOs or IGOs and through small, relatively short-term projects. The need to find individual funding solutions for the expansion of the Networks' impact on other regions was recognised as a considerable challenge. It was also mentioned that despite available funding, (most REU support to ESCORENA is used for participants from CEE or CIS Member Nations) it is often difficult to find and/or communicate with interested and qualified scientists from CEE and CIS countries for participation or project collaboration. REU is to play a more active role in trying to find funding for special projects related to research development or research applications, but network members have to present project ideas. For this purpose a general project fiche was distributed as a guideline.

After extensive discussions on network modalities, structure, funding and the age-old challenge of integrating research and its application, specific actions to improve the Network system according to ECA (European Commission on Agriculture) recommendations (Annex IV) and integration of FAO priorities were concretised on Saturday morning.

The main issues considered for improvement were:

  • network communication (within and between the Networks and to the outside), including network visibility, efficiency and knowledge transfer;
  • geographic coverage and intensification of activities in selected areas;
  • financial resources (availability, transparency and records/statistics, sponsorship, project approaches); and
  • participation by members and by the Networks in other mechanisms and fora and by outsiders in the network (industry, co-sponsors, other networks, etc.).

The major points of the discussions on what needs to be improved by whom using which tools and resources are summarised in a list in Annex V. This list is to be completed through further discussions.

 

III. DECISIONS

At the end of his four-year term as Coordinators' Representative on ERNAC, Mr Chataigner was thanked by all for his contribution during a time when ERNAC had to undertake a major effort to evaluate the whole of ESCORENA. Mr Morand-Fehr was unanimously elected the new Coordinators' Representative on ERNAC.

FAO/REU's more frequent presence in at least the major network meetings was considered more important than the consequent impact on support availability for other participants.

The frequency of coordinators' meeting every four years is to be maintained, while once a year an email forum/discussion exchange between coordinators should take place.

Coordinators will present short descriptions of project ideas, using the distributed project fiche, for network involvement in the development of research or application of research at national or regional levels predominantly in Central and Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean, but also in other Regions.

The complete report of this meeting will be circulated when all network reports have been received.

It was agreed that the coordinators will send within four months (end of March 2001) a list and/or a short description of special network achievements which can be used for ESCORENA or Network promotion vis-a-vis potential donors. To create better visibility and understanding of the Networks in FAO, with Governments, potential donors and partners such details as specific results, projects, guidelines, technologies, infra- or other structures, evaluations, contributions used by producers and governments and more should be listed.

It was further suggested that REU explore the possibility for a poster or multimedia presentation about ESCORENA for "World Food Summit - Five Years Later" or the 2001 FAO exhibition in Brussels.

A proposal for good network evaluation tools shall be elaborated by coordinators and ERNAC members within six months through email exchange to facilitate self-evaluation by the coordinators and evaluation by outsiders like ERNAC.

The preparation of the interactive phase of the ESCORENA website is expected to be ready for testing at the earliest by the end of February 2001.

It was agreed that the concretising process to identify action and means to improve ESCORENA needed further discussion and reflection. Therefore, the results of the discussion in Grignon should be summarised, distributed to coordinators for further input and be elaborated according to the schedule listed below. Mr Kozlowski agreed to act as the Coordinators' Focal Point to prepare and follow-up the action list (Annex V) in collaboration with the Secretariat. The action plan foresees:

  • by 1 February 2001 collection of input from all coordinators on major activities, priorities, tools, actors and resources for improvements of ESCORENA, i.e. completing the list in Annex II;

  • by 1 April 2001, distribution of a first draft report including these contributions with conclusions for comments by coordinators, prepared jointly by the Coordinators' Focal Point and the Secretariat;

  • by 1 June 2001 a final report, summary and conclusions with concrete suggestions for improvements in ESCORENA along the lines discussed during the meeting;

 

IV. SUMMARY

The meeting was a good opportunity for all coordinators to become familiar with the other networks' activities, recognise common problems and solutions, be updated with or, for the new coordinators, be informed for the first time of FAO priorities and the increased emphasis on ESCORENA's involvement in FAO's field programme. The discussions were extremely active and productive, resulting in a first draft of a plan of action for improving ESCORENA's visibility, efficiency and financial resources.

 

V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Special thanks must go to Mr Morand-Fehr and his team for organising the meeting and to INA P-G and INRA for hosting the event at their excellent facilities in Grignon.

 

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

ARNOUX, M. (ERNAC)
Les Jardins D'Oc - Bat. A
9, Ter Avenue de la Gaillarde
34000 Montpellier
FRANCE
Tel.: (33) 467 041 565
Fax.: (33) 467 662 195

 

BORGHESE, A. (Buffalo)
Instituto Sperimentale per la
Zootecnia
Via Salaria, 31
00016 Monterotondo, Rome
ITALY
Tel.: (39) 06 900 901
Fax.: (39) 06 906 1541
Email: [email protected]

 

BOUNIOLS, A. (Ms) (Soybean)
Centre de recherche de Toulouse
Station d'agronomie, INRA
Chemin de Borde-rouge
BP27, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan Cede
FRANCE
Tel.: (33) 561 285 021
Fax.: (33) 561 735 537
Email: [email protected]

 

BOZZINI, A. (FAO/ERNAC)
FAO, Regional Office for Europe
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
00100 Rome
ITALY
Tel.: (39) 06 570 56724
Fax.: (39) 06 570 55634
Email: [email protected]

 

CHATAIGNER, J. (Rice/ERNAC)
Vert 07430 Veruosc-le-Aunouoy
FRANCE
Tel.: (33) 475 335 641
Fax.: (33) 475 322 884
Email: jean. [email protected]

 

FORTHOMME, C. (Ms) (FAO/REU)
FAO Regional Office for Europe
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome ITALY
Tel.: (39) 06 570 54963
Fax.: (39) 06 570 55634
Email: [email protected]

 

GABINA, D. (CIHEAM/IAMZ)
CIHEAM/IAMZ
Apartado 202
50080 Zaragoza
SPAIN
Tel.: (34) 976 716 000
Fax.: (34) 976 716 001
Email: [email protected]

 

GREEF, J. (SREN)
Institute of Crop and Grassland Science
Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL)
Bundesallee 50
38116 Braunschweig - Volkenrode
GERMANY
Tel.: (49) 531 596 365
Fax.: (49) 531
Email: [email protected]

 

HIRZEL, G. (FAO)
c/o CIRAD
42, Rue Sheffer
75116 Paris
FRANCE
Tel.: (33) 1 5370 2056
Fax.: (33) 1 5370 2050
Email: [email protected]

 

KECHAGIA, U. (Ms) (Cotton)
Cotton and Industrial Plants Institute
National Agricultural Research Foundation
(N.Ag. Res. F.)
57400 Sindos - Thessaloniki
GREECE
Tel.: (30) 31 799 444
Fax.: (30) 31 756 513
Email: [email protected]

 

KOZLOWSKI, R. (Flax)
Institute of Natural Fibres (INF)
ul. Wojska Polskiego 71 b
60630 Poznan
POLAND
Tel.: (48) 618 224 815
Fax.: (48) 618 417 830
Email: [email protected]

 

KRELL, R. (FAO/REU)
FAO
Regional Office for Europe
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
00100 Rome
ITALY
Tel.: (39) 06 570 52419
Fax.: (39) 06 570 55634
Email: [email protected]

 

MACKIEWICZ TALARCZYK, M. (Ms) (Flax)
Institute of Natural Fibres (INF)
ul. Wojska Polskiego 71 b60630 Poznan
POLAND
Tel.: (48) 618 224 815
Fax.: (48) 618 417 830
Email: [email protected]

 

MARTINEZ, J. (RAMIRAN)
CEMAGREF
17, av. de Cucill6
35044 Rennes Cedex
FRANCE
Tel.: (33) 2 9928 1529
Fax.: (33) 2 9933 2959
Email: [email protected]

 

MORAND-FEHR, P. (Sheep and Goat)
Station de nutrition et alimentation
INRA
16 rue Claude Bernard
75231 Paris Cedex 05
FRANCE
Tel.: (33) 1 4408 1757
Fax.: (33) 1 4408 1853
Email: [email protected]

 

MULLER-HAVE, B. (ERNAC)
Fuldastr. 6
26180 Rastede Wahnbek
GERMANY
Tel.: (49) 441 39209
Fax.: (49) 441 39209
Email: [email protected]

 

SKORIC, D. (Sunflower)
Faculty of Agriculture
Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops
M. Gorkog 30
21000 Novi Sad
F.R. OF YUGOSLAVIA
Tel.: (381) 21 614 933
Fax.: (381) 21 621 212
Email: [email protected]

 

TROXLER, J. (Pastures and Fodder Crops)
Station federale de recherches agronomiques de Changins
Route de Duilliar
Case Postale 254
CH-1260 Nyon
SWITZERLAND
Tel.: (41) 22 363 4444
Fax.: (41) 22 362 1325
Email: [email protected]

 

VARGAS, J. (Nuts)
Institut de Recerca y Tecnologia
Agroalimentaries (IRTA)
Centre de Mas Bove, Apartat 415
E-43280 Reus
SPAIN
Tel.: (34) 977 343 252
Fax.: (34) 977 344 055
Email: [email protected]

 

OPENING CEREMONY
MULTON, J.-L. (INRA)
L'Institut National de Recherche
Agronomique (INRA)
FRANCE
Email: [email protected]

 

GUERIN, P. (INAPG)
Director
Institut National Agronomique
Paris-Grignon (INA PG)
BP1 - 78850 Thiverval Grignon
FRANCE

DRAFT PROGRAMME

Wednesday, 22 November 2000 Arrival and accommodation of participants (afternoon and evening)

Thursday, 23 November 2000 
08.30 - 09.00 hours Opening of the Meeting
Welcome of INRA Representative
Welcome of CIHEAM Representative
Welcome of FAO Representative
09.00 - 09.15 hours Self-introduction of Participants
09.15 - 09.30 hours Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairmen
Approval of Programme
Information on Meeting Arrangements
09.30 - 10.00 hours Presentation of the Cotton Network Coordinator
10.00 - 10.30 hours Coffee Break
10.30 - 11.30 hours Presentation of the Flax Network Coordinator
11.00 - 11.30 hours Presentation of the Nuts Network Coordinator
11.30 - 12.00 hours Presentation of the Rice Network Coordinator
12.00 - 14.00 hours Lunch Break
14.00 - 14.30 hours Presentation of the Pasture and Fodder Crops Network Coordinator
14.30 - 15.00 hours Presentation of the Olives Network Coordinator
15.00 - 15.30 hours Presentation of the Soybean Network Coordinator
15.30 - 16.00 hours Coffee Break
16.00 - 16.30 hours Presentation of the Sunflower Network Coordinator
16.30 - 17.00 hours Presentation of the Buffalo Network Coordinator
17.00 - 17.30 hours Presentation of the Sheep and Goat Research NetworkCoordinator
17.30 - 18.00 hours Presentation of the RAMIRAN Network Coordinator
18.00 - 18.30 hours Presentation of the Trace Elements Network Coordinator
18.30 - 19.00 hours Presentation of the Oats Working Group Coordinator
19.00 - 19.30 hours Presentation on the ESCORENA Website
Friday, 24 November 2000
08.00 - 08.30 hours Presentation of the SREN Coordinator
08.30 - 09.00 hours Presentation of the CIHEAM Representative
09.00 - 09.30 hours Presentation of the EU Representative (General European Research Policies)
09.30 - 10.00 hours Presentation of the ERNAC Representative
10.00 - 10.30 hours Coffee Break
10.30 - 11.00 hours ECA Report (FAO) - FAO perspectives
11.00 - 13.00 hours General discussion on Networks (operational problems and future perspectives)
13.00 - 14.00 hours Lunch Break
14.00 - 19.00 hours General discussion on Network tools, inter-network collaboration, interregional activities, funding sources, network aims (common and specific), strategies
17.00 - 19.00 hours Meeting of ERNAC (separate room)
19.30 hours Dinner
Saturday, 25 November 2000
08.30 - 09.00 hours FAO European research strategies in relation to FAO activities in Europe
09.00 - 10.30 hours Elaboration of Network aims, common workplans, new strategies, budgetary requirements
10.30 - 11.00 hours Coffee Break
11.00 - 12.30 hours Recommendations and Action Plan. Closing of the Meeting
12.30 - 1400 hours Lunch Break
14.00 hours Transfer to Paris

line2.gif (403 bytes)

 

REPORT OF COOPERATIVE FAO-CIHEAM NETWORK ON SHEEP AND GOATS

COMPTE RENDU ENTRE 1997-2000
SUR LES ACTIVITÉS DU RÉSEAU FAO-CIHEAM DE RECHERCHES
COOPÉRATIVES SUR. LES OVINS ET LES CAPRINS

Pierre Morand-Fehr, Coordinateur du réseau
UMR INRA-INAPG 791
Physiologie de la Nutrition et Alimentation
16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France
Tél. 33 (0)1 44 08 17 56
Fax 33 (0)1 44 0818 53
E-mail: [email protected]

 

I. OBJECTIFS DU RÉSEAU

De 1997 à 2000, le réseau FAO-CIHEAM de recherches coopératives sur les ovins et les caprins a défini son programme d'activités en tenant compte des orientations souhaitées par ses membres et ses partenaires: FAO-REUR-ESCORENA (voir le compte rendu de la consultation de Bella, Italie, 1996) et CIHEAM-IAMZ (voir le compte rendu de la consultation de Paris, 1999), mais aussi des enjeux nouveaux auxquels les productions ovines et caprines doivent faire face en Europe et en Méditerranée (gestion du milieu, notamment des prairies et des pâturages, durabilité des actions de développement ovin et caprin, développement des contacts entre la recherche des pays du Nord et celle du Sud, qualité des produits ovins et caprins).

Ainsi, ce réseau, à la suite de son programme 1993-1996, a développé 5 axes d'activités pendant ces 4 dernières années

  1. Développement de sa politique d'ouverture vers les pays du Sud et même au-delà de son aire d'activité,
  2. Recherche systématique des applications possibles des travaux scientifiques au niveau des éleveurs de moutons et de chèvres,
  3. Efforts pour diffuser encore plus largement ses travaux et s'en donner les moyens,
  4. Choix des sujets prioritaires à étudier au sein du réseau en privilégiant les questions d'actualité et en orientant sa réflexion pour répondre dans la mesure du possible à la demande sociale,
  5. Politique pour inciter les jeunes chercheurs à devenir membres du réseau et ainsi pour que ce réseau renouvelle sa réflexion.

 

 II. STRUCTURES ACTUELLES DU RÉSEAU

Le réseau a développé 3 sous-réseaux parce qu'une telle structuration est bien adaptée aux préoccupations que l'on retrouve dans les organismes de recherches et de développement participant à ce réseau et au niveau des décideurs responsables des secteurs ovins et caprins.

a) L'ensemble du réseau est coordonné par Pierre MORAND-FEHR, UMR INRA-INAPG 791 Physiologie de la Nutrition et Alimentation INRA de l'INAPG, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France, Fax 00 33 1 44 08 18 53, Émail: [email protected]

A. Sous-Réseau Nutrition et Stratégie d'Alimentation Coordinateur Madame Inger LEDIN, Swedish University, Animal Nutrition, PO Box 7024, 75323 UPPSALA Sweden, Fax 00 46 18 67 29 95, Email : [email protected]

B. Sous-Réseau Systèmes de Production Coordinateur Monsieur Roberto RUBINO, Istituto Sperimentale Zootechnica, Viale Basento 106, 85100 POTENZA Italia, Fax 00 39 097 67 99 30, Email : [email protected]

Groupe de travail : Observatoire des systèmes de production ovine et caprine. Animateur Jean-Paul DUBEUF, CIRVAL, Quartier Grossetti, BP 5, 20250 CORTE, Tel 04 95 45 22 22, Fax 04 95 45 22 20,
Email [email protected]

 

C. Sous-Réseau Matériel Animal

Coordinateur Monsieur Dunixi GABINA, IAM/CIHEAM, Apartado 202, 50080 ZARAGOZA Espana, Fax 00 34 976 57 63 77, Email : [email protected]

Le sous-réseau est supporté par deux structures internationales

  • L'organisation pour l'agriculture et l'alimentation de l'ONU (FAO) par l'intermédiaire de son bureau européen (FAO-REU). Correspondant R. Monsieur KRELL, FAO, Via delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 ROMA, Italie, Email : [email protected] or
  • Le Centre International des Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes (CIHEAM, secrétariat général, 11 rue Newton, 75016 Paris, France) par l'intermédiaire de l'Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Zaragoza (IAMZ). Correspondant D. GABINA

D'autres structures soutiennent régulièrement les actions de ce réseau et l'aident matériellement

  • Le bureau Proche-Orient de la FAO (FAO-RNE, correspondant Dr M.Ali TALIB, Regional Animal Production and Health Officer, FAO Near East Regional Office, PO Box 2223, Cairo, Egypt, Tel 202 33 1 61 37, Fax 202 34 9 59 81, Email: [email protected]
  • La Fédération Européenne de Zootechnie (FEZ, correspondant Dr J. BOYAZOGLU, EAAP, Villa del Ragno, Via Nomentana 134 ,00161 ROMA Italie, Tel 00 39 6 8632 91 41, Fax 00 39 6 86 32 92 63, Email : [email protected])

 

b) Objectifs des sous-réseaux

5. Réseau Nutrition et Stratégie d'alimentation

  • Améliorer l'efficacité de l'utilisation des pâturages et des parcours par les petits ruminants grâce à une gestion plus efficace, à une amélioration de l'utilisation de la végétation, à une adaptation du comportement alimentaire et à une amélioration de l'ingestion et de la digestion.
  • Améliorer l'utilisation des aliments non conventionnels (co-produits agricoles et industriels, arbustes fourragers...) par une meilleure disponibilité ou traitement.
  • Etude de la sous-nutrition et des réserves corporelles et leurs conséquences en stratégie alimentaire.
  • Conséquences des caractéristiques alimentaires et du système d'alimentation sur la qualité des produits : carcasses et viande d'agneaux et de chevreaux, lait et fromages de brebis et de chèvre.

 

6. Réseau Systèmes de production

  • Faire l'inventaire des systèmes de production ovine et caprine. Pour cela, mettre au point des méthodologies d'analyses des systèmes pour pouvoir les caractériser et suivre leurs évolutions (observatoire des systèmes).
  • Développer cette stratégie pour les systèmes lait des différents bassins de production mais aussi dans le futur pour les systèmes viande autant au Nord qu'au Sud de la Méditerranée.
  • Analyser spécifiquement les causes réelles des évolutions des systèmes de production ovine et caprine (modification du marché et de la demande, application de nouvelles réglementations notamment sanitaires, impact du tourisme...).
  • Etudier les mécanismes de transfert de technologie en production ovine et caprine et les raisons des succès et des échecs avec les responsables du développement et de la mise en place de ces actions.

 

7. Réseau Matériel génétique

  • Analysis and definition of the objectives in genetic improvement programmes in sheep and goats. An economic approach to increase their profitability as well as the sustainability of the production systems.
  • Data collection in performance recording programmes. The use of electronic devices.
  • Breeding in sheep and goats in relation to the environment.

c) Effectifs (Novembre 20001

Membres du réseau : 271 (83 membres très actifs et réguliers)

Nombre de pays participants : 33

  • 5 pays européens du Sud de la Méditerranée (UE) : France, Italie, Espagne, Portugal, Grèce : 161.
  • 7 pays européens du Centre et de l'Est: Pologne, Bulgarie, Hongrie, Albanie, République Tchèque, République Slovaque, Croatie: 19
  • 8 Pays du Nord de l'Europe: Royaume Uni, Irlande, Suisse, Suède, Norvège, Belgique, Allemagne, Finlande: 29
  • 5 pays du Sud Méditerranéen: Maroc, Algérie, Tunisie, Egypte, Malte : 39
  • 7 pays de l'Est Méditerranéen: Turquie, Syrie, Israël, Chypre, Liban, Irak, Jordanie 24

Effectifs par sous-réseaux

Nutrition: 35 %, Systèmes de production: 42 %, Matériel Animal : 25

Membres féminins: 13.3

Nouveaux membres depuis 2 ans: 23.6

 

III. ACTIVITÉS DU RÉSEAU (1997-2000)

a) programme joint entre réseaux

Nous travaillons avec le réseau Pâturage pour aboutir à un programme joint sur l'évaluation des systèmes incluant du pâturage pour les petits ruminants. Des échanges et des interventions dans les réunions organisées par chaque réseau a fait progresser la question. Nous avons envisagé d'organiser une réunion commune de nos 2 réseaux en 2001 ou début 2002. b) résultats 1. Dans ce rapport, nous ne pourrons donner que quelques exemples

A. Méthodologie

Nous travaillons sur la mise au point de méthodologies qui permettent de développer des protocoles communs et de comparer objectivement les résultats.

  1. Mise au point d'une stratégie alimentaire basée sur l'estimation de l'état corporel des chèvres. Cette méthode est applicable en particulier quand il n'existe pas d'information sur ce que les animaux ingèrent (cas des parcours et des pâturages).
  2. Mise au point d'une méthode pour décrire et caractériser les systèmes de production ovine et caprine à l'aide de critères pertinents. La méthode pour les systèmes laits a été validée.
  3. Mise au point d'une banque de données pour prévoir l'incidence d'une modification de la ration alimentaire sur la nature et la qualité des gras de la carcasse d'agneau. Cette méthodologie très intéressante (BAS et al 2000) peut être appliquée à d'autres secteurs pour créer des outils susceptibles de-répondre aux questions complexes d'actualité.

B. Nutrition

A Méthode pour améliorer la valeur alimentaire des fourrages de faible valeur alimentaire grâce à l'utilisation du PEG.

B Mise en évidence de l'incidence d'une alimentation à base de pâturage naturel sur la qualité du lait de brebis et de chèvre. Ce travail très important doit être poursuivi.

C Mise en évidence des types d'amidon favorable à la gestation et à la lactation des brebis.

C. Systèmes de production

  1. Mise en évidence des effets des systèmes d'élevage : montagne, plaine, confinement sur la qualité et la typicité des fromages de petits ruminants.
  2. Mise en évidence de l'organisation différente des structures de développement en Europe et en Méditerranée. Réflexion au niveau de leur efficacité.
  3. Analyse des différentes approches pour réaliser des transferts de technologie, et des causes qui permettent d'expliquer les réussites et les échecs.

D. Matériel Animal

  1. Ce réseau a fait le bilan sur la situation de l'amélioration génétique (objectifs et programmes) dans les différents pays européens et méditerranéens. Cette information doit permettre une réflexion sur le choix d'une stratégie en fonction des objectifs et des moyens disponibles.
  2. L'analyse en cours doit permettre d'évaluer l'intérêt économique et le caractère durable des différents paramètres sélectionnés en production viande ou lait. Elle doit aboutir à augmenter l'efficacité de l'amélioration génétique.

2. Nous avons recherché des aides financières extérieures à la FAO, en particulier au niveau du CIHEAM qui finance fortement les missions et les publications (Options Méditerranéennes). Nous exprimons tous nos remerciements à nos collègues du CIHEAM pour cette aide financière.

Nous avons reçu une aide de la part de la FEZ, notamment dans l'organisation de certaines réunions et aussi au niveau de certaines publications (LPS N° Spécial de la Série EAAP, Elsevier).

3. Nous rencontrons de plus en plus de difficultés pour organiser les réunions de sousréseaux. L'aide financière prioritaire va aux collègues du Sud. Mais les rapporteurs ou ceux qui ont réalisé des importants travaux souhaitent être financés.

La structure actuelle du réseau permet d'organiser des groupes de travail informels et limités dans le temps et ainsi de répondre aux besoins actuels.

La principale difficulté actuellement est de financer l'observatoire des systèmes de production qui par son fonctionnement a besoin d'une réunion par an.

  1. La seconde difficulté est de ne pas savoir à l'avance si on aura le financement pour organiser une réunion ou éditer un livre. Il faudrait connaître notre budget suffisamment longtemps à l'avance.

 

4. PROGRAMME FUTUR

  • Poursuivre les actions engagées en particulier développer les banques de données pour répondre aux questions sur la qualité de produits et les systèmes de production.
  • Mais aussi les approfondir à l'aide de la modélisation pour répondre aux besoins futurs des décideurs.
  • Développer et aider les transferts de technologie en production ovine et caprine. Evaluer les méthodologies et établir leurs limites.
  • Aider les analyses pour faire des choix au niveau de l'amélioration génétique, de la stratégie alimentaire plus judicieux et plus efficaces.

Actions nouvelles

  • Etudier l'organisation des filières des produits ovins et caprins pour identifier les causes de réussites et d'échecs.
  • Analyser les entraves au développement de l'élevage biologique des petits ruminants.
  • Développer de nouvelles collaborations avec d'autres réseaux ou organisations au niveau mondial afin d'augmenter la diffusion de nos résultats.
  • Modifier notre politique de diffusion en publiant des documents destinés spécifiquement aux responsables du développement.

 

V. RÉUNIONS DU RÉSEAU (1997-2000)

1997

  • Séminaire du sous-réseau Ressources Génétiques et Sélection : Recueil de données et définition des objectifs des programmes d'amélioration génétique des ovins et des caprins : nouveaux aspects. Toulouse (France), 9-11 mars 1997. 63 participants, 15 pays représentés : Albanie 1, Bulgarie 1, , Chypre 1, Emirats Arabes Unis 1, Espagne 10, France 33, Grèce 2, Hongrie 3, Israël 1, Italie 3, Liban 1, Maroc 3, Pologne 1, Tunisie 1, Turquie 1, 6 participations féminines.
  • Meeting of coordination network board. Paris (France), 28-29 April 1997. 4 participants: Suède 1, Espagne 1, Italie 1, France 1. 1 participation féminine
  • Séminaire of the network of sheep and goat production systems. Bella (Italy), 24-27 October 1997. 70 participants, 21 pays représentés : Albanie 1, Bulgarie 1, Chypre 1, Egypte 2, Espagne 8, France 16, Grèce 1, Hongrie 2, Italie 22, Israël 1, Maroc 3, Norvège 1, Pologne 2, Portugal 1, Roumanie 1, Royaume Uni 1, Suisse 1, Suède 1, Tunisie 2, Jordanie 1, Turquie. 18 participations féminines

 

1998

  • Séminaire sur la nutrition des petits ruminants. INAPG Centre de Grignon (France), 3-5 septembre 1998. 58 participants soit 14 % de plus qu'à la précédente réunion du sousréseau Nutrition (Rabat, Maroc, 24-26 octobre 1996), 58 particpants, 14 pays représentés: Antilles 1, Chypre 1, Egypte 2, Espagne 8, France 23, Grèce 1, Irlande 1, Italie 7, Israël 2, Liban 1, Norvège 2, Royaume-Uni 2, Suède 1 Tchéquie 1, Tunisie 4, et. 48 % des participants y assistaient pour la première fois ; ce qui représente un bon taux de renouvellement. 11 participations féminines
  • Réunion de l'Observatoire des systèmes de production ovine et caprine: Istituto Zootecnico et Caseario per la Sardegna, Olmedo (Sardaigne, Italie), 15-17 octobre 1998, 17 participants, 6 pays représentés : Espagne 3, France 5, Italie 6, Grèce 1, Maroc 1, Portugal 1, 3 participations féminines.
  • Réunion restreinte du réseau Matériel Animal et Sélection au cours du 6è` Symposium International sur la traite des petits ruminants. Athènes (Grèce), 29-30 septembre 1998. 27 participants, 10 pays représentés : Bulgarie 1, Chypre 1, Espagne 5, France 5, Grèce 5, Hongrie 1. Italie 4, Israël 1, Portugal 1, Royaume Uni 2, Turquie 1, 4 participations féminines.
  • Réunion où la contribution du réseau est importante : Sheep and goat production in Central and Eastern European countries, Budapest (Hongrie), 29 novembre- 2 décembre 1997, 98 participants, 21 pays représentés.

 

1999

  • Réunion de l'Observatoire des systèmes de production ovine et caprine. Molina de Segura (Espagne), 22 septembre 1999, 22 participants, 8 pays représentés : Belgique 1, Egypte 1, Espagne 3, France 7, Grèce 1, Italie 5, Israël 1, Maroc 2, Portugal 1,.
  • Séminaire sur : Systèmes de production et qualité des produits organisé par le sous réseau Systèmes de production. Molina de Segura (Espagne), 23-28 septembre 1999. 75 participants, 12 pays représentés : Belgique 1, Egypte 3, Espagne 28, France 16, Grèce 4, Irak 1, Maroc 5, Pologne 5, Portugal 3, Royaume Uni 4, Tunisie 5. 9 participations féminines.
  • Réunion où la contribution des membres du réseau est importante : Session sur la nutrition de la chèvre laitière en conditions intensives. 50è Réunion de la Fédération Européenne de Zootechnie, Zurich (Suisse), 22-26 août 1999, 5 rapports généraux présentés par les membres du réseau.

 

2000

  • Réunion du sous-réseau Nutrition et Stratégie Alimentaire, Palais des Congrès, Tours (France), 15 mai 2000. Objet: préparation du séminaire d'Hammamet (Tunisie, 2001) 17 participants, 8 pays représentés : Belgique 1, Egypte 1, Espagne 3, France 4, Italie 4, Israël 2, Suède 1, Tunisie 1. 5 participations féminines.
  • Réunion du sous-réseau Systèmes de Production et de l'observatoire des systèmes. Objet préparation du prochain séminaire du réseau Systèmes et de la prochaine réunion de l'Observatoire des systèmes de production ovine et caprine, Vittoria (Espagne, décembre 2000). Palais des Congrès, Tours (France), 16 mai 2000. 20 participants, 8 pays représentés : Belgique 1, Egypte 1, Espagne 3, France 10, Israël 1, Italie 1, Jordanie 1, Maroc 2.
  • Consultation technique du réseau FAO-CIHEAM de recherches coopératives sur les ovins et les caprins. Paris, secrétariat général du CIHEAM, 11 rue Newton, 75016 Paris (France), 10-11 février 2000, 8 participants : Allemagne 1, Italie 1, Espagne 1, Suisse 1, Belgique 1, France 3.
  • Réunion restreinte du sous-réseau Nutrition, Hammamet (Tunisie), 28 octobre 2000. Objet: préparation du séminaire de 2001 Hammamet (Tunisie). 6 participants : Espagne 1, France 1, Maroc 1, Tunisie 3. Une participation féminine.
  • Réunion de l'Observatoire des systèmes de production ovine et caprine. Vittoria (Espagne), 17-19 décembre 2000.

 

VI. PUBLICATIONS (1997-2000)

1. Sheep and goat contact

Cette newsletter Sheep and Goat Contact (SGC) est utilisée pour informer et rendre compte aux membres du réseau, du travail et des activités de ce réseau dans les différents secteurs. Il a été publié en général 2 fois par an jusqu'en 1998. Ensuite nous avons adopté le système de profiter de la publication d'un compte rendu d'une réunion du réseau pour envoyer un numéro de SGC. Une partie de la diffusion de SGC en 2000 a été effectuée par Email.

2. Publications en 1997

Recent advances in small ruminant nutrition. Ed by LINDBERG J.E., GONDA H.L. and LEDIN I. Options méditerranéennes, Série A, Séminaires méditerranéens N°34. Publ. FAO/CIHEAM/IAV Hassan II Maroc 252 p.

Data collection and définition of objectives in sheep and goat breeding programme : New projects. Ed by GABINA D. and BODIN L. Options méditerranéennes, série A, Séminaires méditerranéens N°33. Publ. FAO/CIHEAM/INRA 246 p.

Recent advances in goat research. Ed by MORAND-FEHR P. Cahiers Options méditerranéennes Vol 25. Publ CIHEAM/FAO 98 p.

3. Publications en 1998

Publication à laquelle les membres du réseau ont largement contribué

Special issue of thé small ruminant research. Proc. of the symposium on sheep and goat production of the World Conference on Animal Production. Séoul (Corée), June 1998

4. Publications en 1999

Systems of sheep and goat production : organization of husbandry and role of extension services. Eds R. RUBINO AND P. MORAND-FEHR, Options Méditerranéennes, Série A, Séminaires Méditerranéens N°38 1999, 401p.

Meeting on analysis and definition of thé objectives in genetic improvement programmes in sheep and goats. IAM Zaragoza, 8-20 Nov. 1999 (first draft).

Seminar on production systems and product quality , Molina de Segura, Murcia 23-25 Sept 1999.(first draft).

Recueil d'indicateurs de fonctionnement et d'évolution des systèmes de production ovine et caprine, TOUSSAINT G. et al. Doc. FAO/CIHEAM/CIRVAL, 30p.

Situation et perspectives des systèmes de production : résultats 1997-1998. BOUTONNET J.P., CHOISIS Ph., DUBEUF J.P., FALAGAN A., LIGIOS S., OREGI L., PACHECO F., ROCHON J.P., RUBINO R., TOUSSAINT G., Doc. FAO/CIHEAM/CIRVAL, 30 p + 64 p tableaux et annexes.

5. Publications en 2000

Sheep and goat nutrition : Intake, digestion, quality of products and rangelands. Ed by LEDIN I. and MORAND-FEHR P. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 5, 201 pp. Publ. FAO/CIHEAM/INAPG/INRA.

Livestock Production Science, Spécial issue on Nutrition of sheep and goats. Eds by P. MORAND-FEHR and T.T. TREACHER, Mai 2000.

Objectives in genetic improvement programme in sheep and goats. Proc. Meeting Zaragoza 18-20 Nov 1999. Options Méditerranéennes, 2000 Série A, Séminaire méditerranéens ed by D. GABINA.

Articles rédigés par les membres du réseau à partir du travail réalisé dans le cadre du programme de ce réseau

MORAND-FEHR P. 2000. Characteristics of goat research in Europe. Proc. 8th Intern. Conf. on goats, Tours-Poitiers, 15-21 May 2000, p897.

MORAND-FEHR P., 2000. Interest of research network : Case of thé FAO CIHEAM coopérative research network in sheep and goats. Proc. 8`h Intern. Conf. on goats, ToursPoitiers, 15-21 May 2000, p907.

MORAND-FEHR P., SANZ SAMPELAYO M.A., FEDELE V., LE FRILEUX Y., EKNAES M, SCHMIDELY Ph., GIGER REVERDIN S., BAS P., RUBINO R., HAVREVOLL O., SAUVANT D., 2000. Effect of feeding on thé quality of goat milk and cheeses. Proc. 8`h Intern. Conf. on goats, Tours-Poitiers, 15-21 May 2000, p53-58.

MORAND-FEHR P., DUBEUF J.P. FALAGAN A., LE JAOUEN J.C., BOYAZOGLU J., Réflexions sur les systèmes de production caprine dans le Bassin méditerranéen. Intern. Symp. Prospects for a Sustainable Dairy Sector in thé Mediterranean. (Proc. In press).

6. Publications en préparation pour 2001

Proc. Meeting of thé subnetwork on systems of sheep and goats production, Molina de Segura (Sp) ed by A. FALAGAN and R. RUBINO, Options Méditerranéennes (March 2001).

Situation et perspectives des systèmes de production ovine et caprine. Résultats 1999-2000. Document rédigé par l'Observatoire des systèmes de production ovine et caprine. Publ. FAO/CIHEAM/CIRVAL.

Document auxquel les membres du réseau ont largement contribué

Spécial issue of Livestock Production Science. 2001. ed by D. GABINA on Breeding Improvement of dairy ewes.

line2.gif (403 bytes)

 

REPORT OF BUFFALO NETWORK

COORDINATOR: A. Borghese
Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia
Via Salaria, 31 '00016 Monterotondo, Italy

 

I. OBJECTIVES OF THE NETWORK

The main objective of the Network is to develop a system of cooperation among research institutions from buffalo producing countries of Europe and the Near East with a view to providing scientific and professional support to the buffalo production sector in general and to small subsistence farmers in particular. The Network collects and analyses data on production systems, buffalo reproduction and marketing of buffalo products, and disseminates the information through meetings; workshops and the "Buffalo Newsletter". Short- to medium-term objectives include collection of data on animal genetic diversity, reproduction and the establishment of performance recording systems.

 

 II. PRESENT STRUCTURE OF THE NETWORK

a. Structure

The Network consists of four working groups:

1. Reproduction and Biotechnology - L. Kanchev (Bulgaria)

2. Livestock Systems - F. El Kirabi (Egypt)

3. Products - D. Matassino (Italy)

4. Genetic resources - B. Moioli (Italy)

 

b. Objectives of the working groups

1. Working Group - Reproduction and Biotechnology

The Group acts as a forum for exchange of research results and as a coordinating body for research on the buffalo reproduction and biotechnology. The Group has identified major issues affecting buffalo reproduction and the efficiency of the buffalo production and adopted a programme of cooperative research in the following fields:

• puberty and ovarian activity maintenance;

• post partum anoestrus and interpartum period reduction;

• ovulation detection and improvements in artificial insemination efficiency;

• seasonality and oestrus induction;

• superovulation and embryo transfer;

• in vitro maturation and fertilisation.

The main objective of the Group is to contribute to the efficiency of buffalo production through the attainment of better reproduction rates, early maturity and development and improvement of insemination efficiency. The Group organised an International Symposium on Buffalo Reproduction (Sofia, Bulgaria, 6-8 October 1995) the Proceedings of which were published in the Bulgarian-Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol. 2, N. 1 1996 (1-132).

2. Working Group - Livestock Systems

The objective of the Group is to improve efficiency of buffalo production through enhanced research in the area of production systems, in particular for small holders conditions. To ascertain and calculate the buffalo nutritional requirements for growth, pregnancy and milk production; to improve the quality of crop residues as a base for buffalo nutrition in extensive production systems were considered as a priority for research and extension. The Group was the organiser of a Symposium on Buffalo Resources (Cairo, Egypt, October 1996) the proceedings of which were published by the Animal Production Research Institute of Cairo.

3. Working Group - Buffalo products

The major objective of the Group is to provide scientific base and guidelines for production, control and protection of quality of typical buffalo products, to enhance consumption and thus to contribute to the efficiency of the sector and to improve standards of buffalo producers.

The Working Group organises exchange of experience and information on on-going research in buffalo products. Research covers consumption and marketing of buffalo products. Results of comparative studies on buffalo products: milk, meat and skin, were presented at the International Symposium on Buffalo Products held at Paestum, Italy (1-4 December, 1994) and published in the EAAP Publication No. 82, 1996 (1-271).

4. Working Group - Genetic resources

The Group has two objectives:

  • Introduction of milk performance recording of buffalo in developing countries through drafting simplified guidelines according to the standards of the International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR), that promoted a Meeting in Slovenia (Bled, 16-17 May 2000).
  • Comparative studies of genetic diversity of buffalo breeds.

 

III. ACTIVITIES OF THE NETWORK (1997-2000)

a. Joint programmes with other organisation.

a. l with the International Buffalo Federation

The Coordination centre of the Buffalo Network (Animal Production Research Institute, Rome) has actively participated in the organisation of the Fifth World Buffalo Congress (Caserta 13-16 October 1997) together with the International Buffalo Federation, through: (i) revising the papers to be presented at the Congress; (ii) editing the Proceedings; (iii) convening a round table during the Congress on the status of the buffalo research and the future priorities in Europe and the Near East.

a.2 with the animal nutrition scientists of Italian Universities.

The Coordination centre of the Buffalo Network (Animal Production Research Institute, Rome) has involved the Italian scientists in animal feeding and nutrition and convened a meeting in Turkey (Antakya, 8-10 October, 1998) with buffalo farmers of several countries to discuss feeding strategies in intensive and extensive production systems.

a.3 with INTERBULL (International Committee for Standardisation of genetic evaluation of bulls).

a.4 with the International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR) to promote buffalo recording in developing countries through the draft of simplified standardised guidelines.

b. Results

  1. Major achievement of the round table on the status/future of buffalo research (1997) was to have convened not only participant of the traditional countries (Egypt, Bulgaria, Romania, Iraq, Syria, Greece, Italy, Turkey) but also Azerbaijan and Iran. The round table was therefore the first step in the cooperation with these two more isolated countries.
  2. Major achievement of the Workshop on buffalo feeding (1998) was to put together buffalo farmers that presented their practical problems in buffalo feeding and high level nutritionists. The discussion dealt with both intensive and extensive feeding systems. Results of the discussion are published in issue no. 11 (1999) of the Buffalo newsletter.
  3. Major achievement of the INTERBULL meetings (1997) was the decision to involve a few countries in a pilot multi-country project of bull evaluation, that will likely start in 2001 as soon as the difficulties met because of the regulation of semen export/import will be overtaken.
  4. Major achievement of the cooperation with the International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR) was the organisation of the Joint FAO-ICAR Workshop on Animal recording for improved buffalo management strategies (2000) to which 30 participants of 17 countries took part. The output of the Workshop are the Simplified guidelines for milk recording in buffalo in developing countries that are in agreement with the ICAR standards, and were drafted to promote animal recording at country level as well as exchange of information on buffalo productivity in the world.
  5. The coordination centre has conducted a survey on the extent of milk recording of buffalo and has published the results of this survey that include data on production and reproductive parameters of 15 countries.
  6. A research project aiming to evaluate the genetic diversity of three populations of buffalo- is being carried out within the network activities. This is the only research project started thanks to the international links created by the network. Participating countries are Italy, Greece and Egypt. The Animal Genetics laboratory of the Animal Production Research Institute, Rome, has provided the facilities, the researchers and the consumables for the research, and the DNA samples of the Italian buffalo population. The Greek and Egyptian partners have provided the DNA samples of the buffalo populations of the respective countries.
  7. A visiting professor of Animal Breeding from North Iraq was host by the Coordination centre of the Buffalo network for three weeks during Summer 2000, and was offered the opportunity to visit Italian Universities and breeders cooperatives with the purpose to start a bilateral cooperative research/development project on livestock genetic improvement.
  8. The scientifically/technical journal of the Buffalo network (Buffalo newsletter) is regularly published twice every year and circulated in 1,200 copies.

 

External financial support for network activities

Except for the workshops (that were all financed by FAO REUS and RNE), other activities Were financed by FAO-AGA (development of milk recording of buffalo) and by the Italian Ministry of Agriculture (genetic diversity of different buffalo populations).

 

Organisational difficulties and solutions

Our network is composed mainly by developing countries' that are also politically isolated (Eastern Europe, Near East). In the organisation of any meeting, a huge amount of work (at least two full-time months) is waisted in the procedures to provide the visas to the participants. We do not see solutions to this problems, therefore we take care of all the procedures because we want to continue this cooperation activity. However, we have the impression that, in general, the FAO representations in the developing countries which we are cooperating with do not offer the practical help that they could provide during these procedures.

A second difficulty is the lack of facilities, in a few countries, to connect to Internet. Also in this case we suggest that the FAO respective representations be active either in providing such tools to the network coordinator, or to speed up communications between coordination centre and national coordinators through other means (fax, telephone, express courier, etc).

 

Financial constraints

These are the major constraints, because we deal only with developing countries. This is also the reasons for which three Working Groups have not been active during the past three years.

In fact, the ongoing network activity is being carried out either by the coordination centre (Italy) or by the Working Group on Genetic Resources (also coordinated by Italy).

Suggestion: proposals to support the network activities might be done directly and officially by FAO to the Ministries of Foreign Affairs of the member countries.

 

Future activities

The project to investigate in the genetic diversity of buffalo will continue, because many countries expressed their interest in being included in it. However, when many more samples will need to be analysed, it will be impossible to carry out all the DNA typing only in the Italian laboratory for lack of funds. It is necessary to provide funds for including other laboratories (including the training, the facilities and the consumables).

The project for promoting buffalo milk recording as well as the regular survey to compare buffalo productivity will continue. One country has demonstrated interest to start this activity even with no external financial support (Turkey).

Workshop on developments in buffalo A.I. technology. Istituto Sperimentale -per la Zootecnia (Rome, Italy, October 2001).

The workshop objective is to provide informations on the state of art of artificial insemination (A.I.) in buffalo and to exchange the experiences of participants.

It will last two days in which Keynote Lectures will be presented and followed by discussion. About 25 participants are expected

 

Program

1st day: Key Lectures: .

- Factors affecting Breeding Activity and Fertility in the Buffalo

- Oestrous Cycle and Techniques Used in Oestrus Detection

- Artificial Control of Oestrus and Ovulation

2nd day: Key Lectures:

- Factors influencing Uptake of A.I.

- Semen Quality and Fertility in Buffalo Bulls

- Freezing of Buffalo Semen

- Insemination Procedure

 

CONCLUSIONS

  1. The buffalo network is the only in the world
  2. The Buffalo Newsletter is a helpful way of communication and transfer of technical and scientific news.
  3. The network is the propositive centre of international research projects.
  4. In the past the Coordinator received $ 10,000 for meetings and $ 4,000 for coordination expenses; this year we received only $ 500 for the coordination, insufficient to publish newsletter and to promote common projects with developing countries, that are (except for Italy and Greece) the components of our network.

 line2.gif (403 bytes)

REPORT OF FAO-CIHEAM INTERREGIONAL COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORK ON NUTS

Francisco J. Vargas
Nut Network Coordinator
Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentkies (IRTA)
Departament d'Arboricultura Mediterrania
Centre de Mas Bové
Apartat 415, 43280 Reus. Spain
E-mail: [email protected]

In this report, a summary account of objectives, organisation and activities, carried out after the last ESCORENA Coordinators' Meeting (Bella, Italy; May 1996), of the Network on Nuts is presented.

 

I. OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the Network are to promote the exchange of information, joint applied research, exchange of germplasm and to establish close links between researchers involved in research on nut production.

 

II. STRUCTURE

The Network was established in 1990, after an Expert Consultation organised by FAO (REU, RNE and AGPS) in Yalova (Turkey). Member institutions and researchers come from the 41 European and 30 Near East Region FAO Member Nations. Some Network members also come from outside of the two Regions. In 1996, FAO and CIHEAM agreed to co-sponsor the Network. Since the start of its activities, the Network has received widespread support from different national and international institutions.

 

II. a. Coordination centre and subnetworks

The structure of the Network is based on a Coordination Centre and 9 Subnetworks (Table 1). IRTA Mas Bové has been the Coordination Centre from the Expert Consultation in 1990. The Network was established with five subnetworks: Almond, Hazelnut, Pecan, Pistachio and Walnut. The subnetworks on Chestnut and Stone Pine were created in 1991 and 1995 respectively. Two disciplinary, rather than species oriented, subnetworks were established in 1994: Genetic Resources and Economics.

The general activities of the Nut Network are proposed, discussed, agreed and planned in the Technical Consultations (representatives of the member countries) and the Coordination Board Meetings (FAO and CIHEAM Officers, Network Coordinator and Subnetwork Liaison Officers). The First Technical Consultation was held in Morocco in 1996. Five Coordination Board Meetings have already been held (Spain 1991, Turkey 1994, Portugal 1995, Morocco 1996 and Italy 1997).

 

Table 1. Structure of the Network on Nuts.

Network Coordination Centre Coordinator
Nut tree crops IRTA Reus (Spain) F.J. Vargas
Subnetworks Liaison Centres Liaison Officers
Almond Vacant Vacant
Hazelnut Ankara University (Turkey) A.I. Koksal
Walnut INRA Bordeaux (France) E. Germain
Pistachio Kahraman Maras University (Turkey) N. Kaska
Pecan Cukurova University (Turkey) O. Tuzcu
Chestnut Torino University (Italy) G. Bounous
Stonepine INIA-CIFOR Madrid (Spain) G. Catalan
Genetic Resources IRTA Reus (Spain) 1. Badle
Economics SIA Zaragoza (Spain) L.M. Albisu
FAO REU, Rome (Italy) R. Krell and A. Bozzini
CIHEAM IAMZ, Zaragoza (Spain) D. Gabina

 

II. b. Objectives of the subnetworks

The objectives of the seven tree crop species Subnetworks (Almond, Chestnut, Hazelnut, Pecan, Pistachio, Stone Pine and Walnut) are similar, with some specificity according with their crop importance and features. Common aims are to promote exchange of information, joint applied research, exchange of germplasm and to establish close links between researchers involved in research on nut production.

The objectives of the Genetic Resource Subnetwork are to promote the exchange of information, joint applied research and to establish links between researchers involved in research on plant genetic resources and in germplasm conservation of nut species. It promotes also surveys and exchange of germplasm among participating institutions and countries.

The aims of the Economics Subnetwork are to promote the exchange of information and the joint applied research on economics of nut production.

 

 

III. ACTIVITIES

III. a. Joint programmes between networks

Joint action has been taken mainly with different IPGRI Networks. In 1998, the Genetic Resources Subnetwork participated in the European Symposium "Implementation of the Global Plan of Action in Europe" jointly organised by IPGRI and FAO in Braunschweig, Germany. In 1998, the Genetic Resources Subnetwork participated in an International Pistacia Workshop held in Irbid, Jordan organised by the IPGRI's Underutilized Mediterranean species Network. In each of these two meetings reports were presented.

In relation to the Mediterranean Study Group on Pistachios and Almonds (GREMPA) two meetings on almond and pistachio were jointly organised in Meknes, Morocco (1996) and Sanliurfa, Turkey (1999). GREMPA has since 1996 being supported within the framework of the FAO-CIHEAM Network on Nuts.

Regarding the International Society for Horticultural Sciences (ISHS) close collaboration between our specific subnetworks (chestnut, hazelnut and walnut) and their ISHS's corresponding working groups was undertaken for the organisation of three International Symposia.

 

III. b. Results

III. b. 1. Major achievements in special research areas

One of the main activities of the Network is the organisation of technical and coordination meetings. These workshops and conferences, often held in cooperation with other related, large international events, present the forum for specific information exchange, contacts and joint project development.

Several International Symposia have been organised during the last four years with the active participation of Network members. To further the dissemination of information gathered and produced by its members, proceedings and other publications are published, sometimes in close cooperation with other national or international organisations like IPGRI, ISHS, etc.

The Nucis newsletter, published since 1993 once a year and distributed world-wide for free to 1400 readers, presents the Network activities and plans plus articles and reports on nut research in the world. In addition, it includes sections on news and notes, congresses and meetings, events to be held and recent bibliography.

The First Technical Consultation and the Fourth and Fifth Coordinators Meetings to revise and plan activities were organised and held in Meknes, Morocco in 1996 and in Rome, Italy in 1997.

The Second Advanced Course on Production and Economics of Nuts in Adana, Turkey, in 1998, brought together 30 professional participants from nine countries. Activities by Subnetworks are reported below.

The Almond and Pistachio Subnetworks organised respectively the Tenth Seminar of the GREMPA in Meknes, Morocco in 1996 and the Eleventh Seminar in Sanliurfa, Turkey in .1999. In 1997, in collaboration with the Genetic Resources Subnetwork, the Almond Subnetwork published an Inventory of Almond Research, Germplasm and References. Two fellows from Morocco and Turkey were granted by CIHEAM to undertake training during three months on almond breeding.

The Hazelnut Subnetwork organised the Fourth International Congress on Hazelnut (Ordu, Turkey, 1996) and held meetings on hazelnut and genetic resources. In collaboration with the Genetic Resources Subnetwork, it prepared an Inventory of Hazelnut Research, Germplasm and References which was published in 2000.

The Walnut Subnetwork organised the Fourth International Symposium on Walnut in Bordeaux, France, in 1999 and held a meeting. An Inventory of Walnut Research, Germplasm and References is being prepared and it will be published in 2001.

The Pistachio Subnetwork organised and held its meetings during the Tenth and Eleventh GREMPA Seminars , respectively in Meknes, Morocco (1996) and in Sanliurfa, Turkey (1999). Starting in 1995, this Subnetwork participated actively in the preparation of two IPGRI descriptor lists: for pistachio (P. vera) and for wild Pistacia species which were published in 1997 and 1998 respectively. The Subnetwork, jointly with the Genetic Resources Subnetwork, is preparing an inventory of Pistachio Research, Germplasm and References.

The Chestnut Subnetwork held a meeting during the Second International Symposium on Chestnut in Bordeaux, France, in 1998. It is preparing an Inventory of Chestnut Research, Germplasm and References which will be published in early 2001.

The Stone Pine Subnetwork organised an International Symposium on stone pine in Valladolid, Spain, in 2000 and published the Proceedings.

The Genetic Resources Subnetwork held several meetings together with the corresponding species: on hazelnut in Ordu, Turkey (1996), on almond and pistachio in Meknes, Morocco (1996), on pistachio in Sanliurfa, Turkey (1999), and on walnut in Bordeaux, France (1998). In 1998, the Subnetwork participated in the International Symposium on Conservation and Sustainable Utilisation of Plant Genetic Resources (Braunschweig, Germany) and took an active part in the International Pistacia Workshop held in Irbid, Jordan. It has participated in the preparation of the Inventories of Research, Germplasm and References on two species (almond and hazelnut) and is currently involved in the preparation of similar catalogues for chestnut, walnut and pistachio. It has actively participated in the preparation of the IPGRI descriptor lists for pistachio (P. vera) and wild Pistacia species published in 1997 and 1998, respectively and the revision of the IPGRI descriptor list for almond.

The Economics Subnetwork held the Second Meeting in Zaragoza, Spain, in 1996, and edited the Proceedings in 2000.

 

III. b. 2. Major achievements in obtaining external financial support

Regular support has been received from the Spanish INIA and IRTA institutes. In addition, by coorganization with IPGRI of joint activities, external support has been received. Also in the organisation of most Meetings and Symposia, local agencies and funding bodies have provided widespread support to activities organised by the Network.

 

III. b. 3. Organisational difficulties and solutions

Regarding FAO, in recent years we have faced financial uncertainty for planning and carrying out activities. Also the FAO system of making funding available by LoA is, in certain cases, uneasy.

Originally the nut Network was structured in different subnetworks and it has since worked well. However, due to the close retirement of some Liaison Officers it is necessary to undertake a process of change and renewal. During the V Coordination Board Meeting held in 1997 it was decided that the following meeting (the VI) should have been held in 1999 where steps on this issue would have been taken. Due to lack of financial support from FAO, this meeting has been postponed until early 2001, and thus this renewal process still stands by.

 

III. b. 4. Financial constraints and solutions

The main difficulty is the uncertainty on financial support for activities (apart from Secretariat and the Nucis newsletter which are regularly funded through LoA). Each year a Network budget based on activities is presented to FAO and approval or rejection lasts in excess. It is essential for activity planning to know the available budget. The planned meetings of Economics Subnetwork have been cancelled due to lack of funding. In contrast, budgeting presented to CIHEAM is usually assessed and approved within a short period. Two times INCO Project proposals involving several developed and developing countries have been submitted to the EC without success. This aspect of joint applied research should be readdressed.

 

III. b. 5. Future activities

Regarding cross-working group's themes important effort would be given to prepare and publish Inventories on Research, Germplasm and References on chestnut, walnut and pistachio by the corresponding Subnetworks jointly with the Genetic Resources working group. Some Symposia and Meetings on almond and pistachio, chestnut, walnut and hazelnut are planned for coming years. The issue of joint research should be further explored, the Economics Subnetwork is planning to make a proposal and apply for EU funding after having a workshop.

 

IV. MEETINGS

Table 2 includes a list of technical and coordination meetings held with the participation of the Nut Network.

 

V. PUBLICATIONS

Year 1996:

BATLLE, I. (Ed). 1996. NUCIS Newsletter. Information Bulletin of the Research Network on Nuts (FAO-CIHEAM). Published by IRTA, Reus. Number 5, 36 pp.

CATALAN, G. (Ed). 1996. Proceedings of the "I Reunion de la Red de Frutos Secos de La FAO sobre el Pino Pinonero". El Pino Pinonero como drbol productor de frutos secos en los paises mediterraneos. Madrid, 1995. Published by INIA, Madrid, 148 pp. (Number of papers: 12. Stonepine Subnetwork).

Year 1997:

BARONE, E., PADULOSI, S., VAN MELE, I. (Eds.). 1997. Descriptors for Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.). Published by IPGRI, Rome, Italy, 51 pp. (Contribution: Pistachio and Genetic Resources Subnetworks).

BATLLE, 1. (Ed). 1997. NUCIS Newsletter. Information Bulletin of the Research Network on Nuts (FAO-CIHEAM). Published by IRTA, Reus. Number 6, 52 pp.

GERMAIN, E. (Ed). 1997. Amelioration d'especes a fruits a coque: noyer, amandier, pistachier. (Resultats de recherches menees au titre du Programme CAMAR CE/DG.VI, contrat 8001CT90-0023). Options Mediterraneennes, Serie B 16, 147 pp. (Number of papers: 8. Almond, Pistachio and Walnut Subnetworks).

GOMES PEREIRA, J.A., MARTINS, J.M.S., PINTO DE ABREU, C. (Eds). 1997. Proceedings of the "Third International Walnut Congress". Alcobaca Portugal, 1995. ISHS. Acta Horticulturae 442, 445 pp. (Number of papers: 70. Walnut Subnetwork)

KOKSAL, A. I., OKAY, Y. AND GUNES, N.T. (Eds). 1997. Proceedings of the "Fourth International Symposium on Hazelnut". Ordu, Turkey, 1996. ISHS. Acta Horticulturae 445, 556 pp. (Number of papers: 72. Hazelnut Subnetwork).

MONASTRA, F; RAPARELLI, E. 1997. Inventory of almond research, germplasm and references. Published by FAO and CIHEAM, Roma. REUR Technical Series 51, 232 pp. (Almond and Genetic Resources Subnetworks).

Year 1998:

BATLLE, I. (Ed). 1998. NUCIS Newsletter. Information Bulletin of the Research Network on Nuts (FAO-CIHEAM). Published by IRTA, Reus. Number 7, 44 pp.

CIHEAM (Ed). 1998. Proceedings of the "X GREMPA Seminar". Meknes, Morocco, 1996. Cahiers Options Mediterraneennes 33, 237 pp. (Number of papers: 36. Almond and Pistachio Subtnetworks).

KASKA, N., VAN MELE, I. PADULOSI, S. (eds). 1998. Descriptors for Pistacia spp. (excluding Pistacia vera L.). Published by IPGRI, Rome, Italy, 48 pp. (Contribution: Pistachio and Genetic Resources Subnetworks).

Year 1999:

ALBISU, L.M. (ed). 1999. Proceedings of the "Seminar of the Subnetwork on Economics of the FAO-CIHEAM Network on Nuts". Economics of nuts in the Mediterranean basin. Zaragoza, Spain, 1996. Options Mediterraneennes, Serie A 37, 135 pp. (Number of papers: 10. Economics Subnetwork).

BATLLE, I. (ed). 1999. NUCIS Newsletter. Information Bulletin of the Research Network on Nuts (FAO-CIHEAM). Published by IRTA, Reus. Number 8, 46 pp.

BATLLE, I.; MONASTRA, F.; KOKSAL, A.I.; GERMAIN, E.; KASKA, N.; TUZCU, O.; GOMES PEREIRA, J.A.; CATALAN, G.; VARGAS F.J. 1999. Nut tree genetic resources conservation and documentation in Europe and the Mediterranean region. European symposium on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, Braunschweig (Alemania), 1998. Published by IPGRI, Roma: 343. (Genetic Resources Subnetwork).

SALESSES, G. (ed). 1999. Proceedings of the "Second International Symposium on Chestnut". Bordeaux, France, 1998. ISHS. Acta Horticulturae 494, 528 pp. (Number of papers: 78. Chestnut Subnetwork).

Year 2000:

CATALAN, G. (ed). 2000. Proceedings, of the "Primer Simposio del Pino Pinonero (Pinus pinea L.)". Valladolid, Spain, 2000. Published by Junta de Castilla y Leon, Valladolid. Tomo I, 340 pp. and Tomo II, 438 pp. (Number of papers: 80. Stonepine Subnetwork).

KOKSAL, A.I. 2000. Inventory of hazelnut research, germplasm and references. Published by FAO and CIHEAM, Roma. REU Technical Series 56, 129 pp. (Hazelnut and Genetic Resources Subnetworks).

At present in preparation:

Inventory of chestnut research, germplasm and references.

Inventory of walnut research, germplasm and references.

Inventory of pistachio research, germplasm and references.

Proceedings of the "XI GREMPA Seminar". Sanliurfa, Turkey, 1999. Options Méditerranéennes (Number of papers: 78. Almond and Pistachio Subnetworks).

Proceedings of the "Fourth International Walnut Symposium". Bordeaux, France, 1999. Acta Horticulturae. (Number of papers: 97. Walnut Subnetwork).

 

VI. MAJOR LINKS

  • CIHEAM - Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes
  • REU - Regional Office for Europe
  • RNE - Regional Office for the Near East
  • AGPS - FAO, Seed and Plant Genetic Resources Service
  • IPGRI - International Plant Genetic Resource Institute
  • INIA - Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
  • IRTA - Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentaries
Table 2. Nuts Network Meetings
Date Venue Title Participants Observations
1996 Ordu (Turkey) Fourth International Hazelnut Congress Number of participants: 98 Convener:
July- Second Meeting of the Subnetwork on Hazelnut Australia (1), Croatia (2), France (1), Italy (14), Romania Al Koksal
August Second Meeting of the Subnetwork on Germplasm (3), Slovenia (1), Spain (4), Turkey (50), USA (19) and Liaison Officer
Resources (Hazelnut) Yugoslavia (3)
1996 Meknes X GREMPA Meeting (Almond and Pistachio) Number of participants: 31 Convener:
October (Morocco) Meeting of the Subnetworks on Almond and Pistachio France (3), Greece (1), Iran (1), Italy (7), Jordan (1), M. Laghezali
Macedonia (1), Morocco (4), Spain (5), Syria (2), Tunisia Network member
(3) and Turkey (3)
1996 Meknes First Technical Consultation Albania, Belgium, Croatia, France, Greece, Italy, Iran,
October (Morocco) Jordan, Macedonia, Morocco, Spain, Syria, Tunisia,
Turkey, IPGRI, CIHEAM and FAO
1996 Meknes Fourth Coordination Board Meeting France, Italy, Morocco, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey, CIHEAM
October (Morocco) and FAO
1996 Zaragoza Second Meeting of the Subnetwork on Economics Number of participants: 11 Convener:
December (Spain) Greece (1), Italy (1), Portugal (1), Spain (5), Tunisia (1) and L.M. Albisu
Turkey (2) Liaison Officer
1997 Rome (Italy) Fifth Coordination Board Meeting France, Italy, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey, CIHEAM and FAO
October
1998 Braunschweig IPGRI-ECP/GR-FAO European Symposium on Plant 160 participants from 45 countries
June (German) Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
1998 Bordeaux Second International Symposium on Chestnut Number of participants: 121 Convener:
October (France) Second Meeting of the Subnetwork on Chestnut Albania (1), Australia (2), Austria (1), Bosnia-Herzegovina G. Salesses
(1), Chile (1), China R.O. (6), Croatia (1), France (14), Network member
Greece (1), Hungary (2), Italy (28), Japan (2), Korea (2),
Macedonia (1), New-Zealand (1), Portugal (23), Romania
(3), Slovakia (2), Slovenia (2), Spain (3), Switzerland (7),
Turkey (3) and USA (14)

 

Table 2. Nuts Network Meetings (continuation)
Date Venue Title Participants Observations
1998, Irbid (Jordan) IPGRI Workshop on Germplasm Resources on Pistacia Number of participants: 25 Convener:
December Egypt, Greece, Iran, Italy, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, S. Padulosi
Morocco, Pakistan, Spain, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey and (IPGRI)
Uzbikistan
1999, Sanliurfa XI GREMPA Meeting (Almond and Pistachio) Number of participants: 124 Convener:
September (Turkey) Meeting of the Subnetworks on Almond and Pistachio Algeria (1), Australia (6), Belgium (1), Greece (1), Iran (4), B.E. Ak
Israel (2), Italy (1), Portugal (4), South Africa (1), Spain Network member
(4), Turkey (98), USA (1) and Uzbekistan (1)
1999, Bordeaux Fourth International Walnut Symposium Number of participants: 117 Convener:
September (France) Third Meeting of the Subnetwork on Walnut Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, France, E. Germain
Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Hungry, India, Iran, Italy, Liaison Officer
Morocco, New Zealand, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia,
Spain, Syria, South Africa, Turkey, Ukraine, USA and
Yugoslavia
2000, Valladolid Primer Simposio del Pino Pinonero (First Stonepine Number of participants: 350 Convener:
February. (Spain) Symposium) Italy, Morocco, Portugal, Spain and Tunisia G. Catalan
Second Meeting of the Subnetwork on Stone pine Liaison Officer

line2.gif (403 bytes)

REPORT OF INTERREGIONAL RESEARCH NETWORK ON RICE

J. Chataigner, Network Coordinator, INRA France

The network was initiated in 1 990 and officially established in 1 991. It incorporates all European Rice producing countries as well as countries outside of Europe with a Mediterranean climate such California and Australia. The second technical Consultation (Arles, France, 4-7 September 1 996) discussed supply and demand for Mediterranean rice, research programs, variety characteristics and rice cultivation in Australia and California. It reviewed rice cultivation and research in participating countries and activities of its working groups.

The network is oriented to research on Mediterranean rice varieties Research on tropical varieties is covered by international organisations such as the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), the Centro Uernacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) and the West Africa Rice Development Association (WARDA).

 

OBJECTVES, STRUCTURE

The main objective of the Network is to develop scientific exchanges between scientists from national research institutions working on Mediterranean rice.

The challenge is to maintain and, if possible, to increase scientific activity at the level of excellence in conditions where scientists are scattered in small teams working for very different national policies.

These objectives are achieving by

  • regular meetings with dissemination of their proceedings. At the beginning organised by disciplinary sub groups, these meetings are becoming more and more thematics and multidisciplinars.
  • Publication of newsletter MEDORYZAE, oriented towards scientists and professionals.
  • Developing access to international financing (mainly European) for cooperatives research programs.

The structure is organised by disciplinary, which played an important role at the beginning. There are Five sub groups: Biotechnology, Breeding, Agronomy, Technology and Economy/Marketing. Now responsibles for cooperatives programmes are associated to management of the Network.

 

MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS

After ten years, we can say that it is exixting a scientific community; about 70 scientists are participating regularly to meetings and have produced one or more communications, on a total of about 200 scientists recessed. .

In biotechnology, an important development of researches is focused on genome description as support for others cereals. The Network facilitates linkages between teams and participates to debates about finality and relations with research and development. A next meeting is in preparation, organised by biotechnology foundation of Turin, expecting support by European Union.

In Breeding we can observe an acceleration of research with the subnetwork. An important and original program about European genetic resources, financed by E.U., will provide the matter of the international symposium in Krasnodar (Russia) in 2 001.

In agronomy, several European programs are born with the Network, on pests (piryculariose in particular) and red rice. Two others topics were discussed recently, in Egypt and Turkey, concerning Water management and Crop management. A systemic approach is emerging.

In technology and marketing, an important effort was spend about the quality and competitiveness, with an international symposium held in Nottingham (England) in 1 997. Several cooperations between France and Eastern Countries, are continuing on this theme.

But, in my opinion, the best result of the network is the creation of a space of dialog and reflection on the efficient research for rice sector, where the multiplidisciplinarity plays an essential role.

A simple indicator confirms the interest from scientists for the Network. It is their progressive and significant financing for meetings.

 

 SOME PROBLEMS

Organisation Scientists are participating with serious and real interest. But, the majority of them, because are working in small teams and narrow relations with development, have few capacity to take initiative for develop international cooperation For that the network remain very dependant of a " providential " coordinator. This difficulty is not corrected by the dynamism of the institutions, except some cases.

The elaboration of the European research programs is an excellent opportunity to mobilise and improve the scientific level. The network demonstrated its utility in this domain. Since 1.994 Six programs were or are supported by E. U. directly or indirectly prepared by members of the network.

Financial constraint The Network had the advantage of the financial support from France during the 5 first years of its existence. With The FAO support we had the indispensable seed money for publications, news letters and first meetings. Progressively scientists and their institutions took a main part of their participation. The realisation of cooperatives programs brought means for the real scientific activity. We have difficulty to mobilise private money in a sector where organisations and complex European market, let few place for dynamic structural policy, where the research would have a better part.

In the future we can hope that E.U. and FAO which have common interest in development of good scientific relations in Europe and Mediterranean areas, will find solutions to support rice network, and others networks, with harmony. In thus field, in the past, we had some difficulties to benefit normal synergy from the two enormous bodies

Public and Private research With a particular development of the researches in rice biotechnology for a better knowledge for more important cereals (wheat, maize, sorghum...), we assist to the difficulty to use this new potential for rice production and, corollary, the difficulty to mobilise public finance for agronomics and more generally for research and development. Where the private support for research is deficient, we are going toward a dangerous distortion of the competitiveness.

 

SREN publications

Drought Animal Power in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. REU Technical Series 45. FAO. 1997. 116 pp.

No. 46 Renewable Energy Potential energy Crops for Europe and the Mediterranean Region REU Technical Sedes 46. FAO. 1996. 200 per.

Nut publications

No. 51 Inventory of Almond Research. Germplasm and References, REU Technical Series 51. FAO~ 1997. 232 pp.

 

RICE NETWORK PUBLICATIONS

Proceedings of the Workshop on Rice Breeding and Biotechnology, Szarvas, Hungary, 4-7 February 1994. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Volume 8bis. CIHEAM/FAO, 1994.

Volume 15 - MedNetRice (réseau FAO-CIHEAM) Action concertéel/oncerted action: qualité et compétitivité des riz européens/quality and competitiveness of European rice (séminaires/workshops 1994-1995)

n° 1. Perspectives agronomiques de la culture du riz en Méditerranée: réduire la consommation de l'eau et des engrais / Agronomic outlook in Mediterranean rice cultivation: cutting down water consumption and fertilizers. Actes du groupe Agronomie, Sibari, Italie, 19-23 octobre 1994. Ed. J. CHATAIGNER.- Montpellier: CIHEAM/FAO, 1996.- 98 p.

n° 2. Economie du riz dans le bassin méditerranéen/Rice Economics in the Mediterranean Region. Actes du séminaire de Côrdoba, Espagne, 15-16 décembre 1994. Ed. J. CHATAIGNER.- Montpellier: CIHEAM, 1996.- 160 p.

n° 3. Maladies du riz en région méditerranéenne et les possibilités d'amélioration de sa résistance/Rice diseases in the Mediterranean region and breeding for resistance. Actes du séminaire de Montpellier, France, 15-17 mai 1995. Ed. J. CHATAIGNER.- Montpellier: CIHEAM/FAO, 1997.- 148 p.

n° 4. Qualité des riz européens : recherches en cours. Actes du séminaire d'Arles, 18-20 mai 1995. Ed. M. MOURZELAS.- Montpellier: CIHEAM/AC UE DGVI, 1996.- 146 p.

Volume 24 -MedNetRice (réseau FAO-CIHEAM) Action concertée/concerted action: qualité et compétitivité des riz européens/ quality and competitiveness of European rice (séminaires 1996)

n° 1. Une approche de la consommation du riz dans six pays européens par la méthode des groupes cibles (première étape)/A focus group approach to the consumer preference on rice in six European countries (step one). Actes du séminaire de Montpellier, France, 28-29 juin 1996. Ed. J. CHATAIGNER.- Montpellier : CIHEAM, 1997.- 110 p.

n° 2. Activités de recherche sur le riz en climat méditerranéen/Mediterranean rice research activities. Actes de la 2° consultation technique du réseau coopératif interrégional FAO/REU/RNE de recherche sur le riz en climat méditerranéen, Arles, France, 4-7 septembre .1996. Ed. J. CHATAIGNER.- Montpellier : CIHEAM/FAO, 1997.-194 p.

n° 3. Rice quality: a pluridisciplinary approach. Proceedings of the International Symposium held in Nottingham, U.K., 4-7 24-27 November 1997. Ed. J. CHATAIGNER.- Montpellier CIHEAM/FAO, 1997.- 194 p.

Volume 40 - MedNetRice (réseau FAO-CIHEAM) - Future of water management for rice in Mediterranean climate areas, Proceedings of the Sakha workshops, Egypt, 5-6 September 1998. Ed. J. Chataigner - Montpellier: Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, vol. 40 (1999): 113 p.

 

RECENT PUBLICATIONS OF THE SHEEP AND GOAT NETWORK

Morand-Fehr, P., 1991. Goat Nutrition, EAAP Publication No. 46, PUDOC, Wageningen, 308 pp. Grazing behaviour of goats, and sheep, Proceedings of the seminary, Cahiers Option Méditerranéennes, Vol. 5, 1991.

Purroy, A. (ed.), 1991. Etat corporel de brebis et des chevres. Option Méditerranéennes. Serie A: Seminaires Mediterranéens, No 13, 132 pp.

Bourbouze, A. et Rubino, R. (eds.), 1992. Terres colletive en Mediterranée: Histoire, legislation, usage et modes d'utilisation par les animaux. 279 pp.

Nastis, A. (ed.), 1993. Proceedings of the Sheep and Goat Nutrition Workshop, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2426 September 1993.

The study of livestock farming systems in research and development framework, EAAP publication No. 63, Wageningen Pers., 1994.

Etat corporel des brebis et des chevres. Actes du Seminaire FAO/CIHEAM, Saragosse, 24-25 Mars 1994, Cahiers Option Mediterraneennes A-27.

Systems of Sheep and Goat Production, REUR Technical Series no. 35, 1995.

Strategies for Sheep and Goat Breeding, Proceedings of the Workshop of the Subnetwork on Animal Resources, Sidi-Habet, Tunisia, 26-24 March 1995, Cahiers Option Mediterranéennes, Volume 11.

Goat Production System in the Mediterranean. EAAP Publication No. 71.

Somatic Cells and Milk of Small Ruminants. EAAP Publication No.77, Wageningen Pers. 384 pp.

The Optimal Exploitation of Marginal Mediterranean Areas by Extensive Ruminant Production Systems. Proceedings of an international symposium, Hellenic Society of Animal Production, 408 pp.

Morand-Fehr, P. (ed.), 1996. Recent Advances in Goat Research. Collection of papers presented by members of the Network at the VI International Conference on Goats, Beijing, China, 6-11 May 1996. Cahiers Option Mediterranéennes, Vol. 25.

Lindberg, J.E., Gonda, H.L. and Ledin, I. (eds.). Recent Advances in Small Ruminant Nutrition. Proceedings of the meeting of the Subnetwork on Nutrition, Rabat, Morocco, 24-26 October 1996. Cahiers Option Mediterranéennes, Serie A Vol. 34.

line2.gif (403 bytes)

 

REPORT OF FAO/CIHEAM INTERREGIONAL COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORK ON PASTURES AND FODDER CROPS

J.Troxler,
Network Co-ordinator
Swiss Federal Agricultural Research Station, Changins, Ch-1260 Nyon 1, Switzerland

 

I. OBJECTIVES OF THE NETWORK

The Network was established in 1977 as an FAO European research network. Close cooperation with CIHEAM institutes involved in pasture and fodder crops research resulted in the establishment of the joint FAO/CIHEAM sponsorship of the Network in 1995. At the same time the Network was enlarged to become Interregional, also now including members from FAO's Near East Region.

The Network, through its three Working Groups, carries out a number of co-operative research projects based on national research programmes and priorities. Its programmes also include support to the rural development initiatives based on sustainable pasture management.

It organises technical consultations once every four years to review the state of the art in the field of pastures and fodder crop research, to appraise activities carried out in the past four year period and to decide on future programmes. The last Consultation was held in Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, in 1996.

The network regularly publishes a newsletter "Herba" which is distributed world-wide free of charge to over 565 subscribers. Proceedings and studies are published in the REU Technical Series and Cahier Options Mediterranéennes.

 

II. PRESENT STRUCTURE OF THE NETWORK

The Network consists of three subnetworks:

Mountain Pastures - Alan Peeters (Belgium)

Lowland Grasslands - George Fisher (United Kingdom)

Mediterranean Forage Resources - Michel Etienne (France)

Co-ordinator: Jakob Troxler
Station fédérale de Recherches en Production végétale
Changins
1260 Nyon 1, Switzerland
Tel.: (41) 22 3634739
Fax.: (41) 22 3621325
Email: [email protected]
http://www.admin.ch/sar/rac/gch/06_herb/herbages 02 html

 

Mountain Pastures Subnetwork

The Mountain Pastures Working Group is one of the oldest groups of agricultural research cooperation in Europe. In the past, researchers from Alpine countries used to exchange information on their work and organise joint research on specific themes. The Working Group was the initiator of the establishment of the Research Network so as to cover a broad field of pasture management in all regions of Europe and in the Mediterranean area. At its 9th Meeting (Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, 20-23 June 1996) the Working Group discussed the "Role of grazing in the management of agro-pastoral mountain areas". The 10`h Meeting of the Working Group (Brasov, Romania, 10-14 September 1998) dealt with "Methods and tools of extension in mountain farms". The 11th Meeting of the Working Group (Luz St Sauveur, Pyrénées, France, 13-17 September 2000) discussed the "Quality and Valorisation of mountain animal products"

 

Projects of the working group

1) Relations between herd or flock behaviour, pasture management and evolution of the vegetation:

Team Leader: J. Troxler, Swiss Federal Agricultural Research Station, Changins, CH-1260 Nyon 1, Switzerland

 

2) Quality of the mountain animals products:

a) dairy products

b) meat and meat products

Team Leaders: a) J.O. Bosset, Swiss Federal Dairy Research Station of Liebefeld (FAM), CH-3003 Berne, Switzerland

b) S. Gigli, Animal Production Research Institute, Via Salaria 31, I-00016 Monterotondo (Roma), Italie

 

3) Indicators of production systems

Team Leader: in collaboration with the FAO/CIHEAM Network of co-operative research on sheep and goats, subnetwork on production systems

 

4) Methods and tools of extension

Team Leader: A. Peeters, Laboratoire d'Ecologie des Prairies, 5, Place Croix-du-Sud, Bte 1, B-1348
Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
Co-ordinator: Alain Peeters
Laboratoire d'Écologie des Prairies
5, Place Croix-du-Sud, Bte 1
B-1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
Tel.: (32) 10 473771
Fax.: (32) 10 472428
Email: [email protected]

Lowland Grasslands Subnetwork

Utilisation and development of lowland grasslands in Europe is the main concern of this Working Group. Particular attention is given to white clover, its persistency, utilisation by grazing, intercropping and by-cropping of white clover and the nutritional value of secondary grass species.

The Research Conference on Utilisation and Development of Lowland Grasslands in Europe was held in La Coruna, Spain, 13-16 October 1998.

 

Projects of the working group

This Working Group presently works on two specific projects:

 

1) White clover - persistence, production and utilisation:

Team leader: Bodil Frankow-Lindberg, Department of Crop Production Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.

 

2) Sustainable Pastures - management, species utilisation:

Team leader: George Fisher, Kemira Agriculture, Ince Chester CH2 4LB, United Kingdom, Email: [email protected]
Co-operator: George Fisher
Kemira Agriculture
Ince Chester CH2 4LB
United Kingdom
Tel.: (44) 151 357 56 73
Fax.: (44) 151 357 56 05
Email: [email protected]

Mediterranean Forage Resources Subnetwork

The Working Group carries out studies and supports improvements in forage crop production on irrigated and rain-fed land and on development and management of Mediterranean rangelands. It also undertakes studies on the feeding value of forage, rangelands and by-products. Members of the Working Group participated in research projects financed by the European Union, such as "Evaluation des resources fourragères locales dans les régions méditerrandennes", "Selection and utilisation of cultivated fodder trees and shrubs in Mediterranean extensive livestock production systems" and "Exploitation of Mediterranean roughage and by-products".

The 9th Meeting of the Working Group (Badajoz, Spain 26-29 November 1997) discussed "Dynamics and sustainability of Mediterranean pasture systems". Themes of the meeting included presentation of studies on grazing systems based on forage crops, rangelands, cereal crops and trees and grass. The proceedings of the meeting are published in Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 39 (1999). 296 pp. The 10'h Meeting of the Working Group (Sassari, Italy, 4-9 April 2000) discussed "Legumes for Mediterranean forage crops, pastures and alternative uses". The proceedings of the meeting are published in Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 45 (2000). 483 pp.

 

Projects of the working group

The Working Group co-ordinates several joint research projects under the following five specific subject areas:

 

1) Valorisation of forages:

Team leader: to determine

 

2) Utilisation of ligneous plants:

Team leader: to determine

 

3) Forage and grazing systems:

Team leader: A. Pardini, Dipartimento di Agronomia e Produzioni Erbacee, Università degli Studi di Firenze, I-50144 Firenze, Italy.

 

4) Genetic resources and improvement of Mediterranean lucernes:

Team leader: H. Marrakchi, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, 15, Rue Salem Bouhajeb, El Menzah 5, 104 Tunis, Tunisia.

 

5) Sustainable development of Mediterranean arid and semiarid areas:

Team leader: E. Correal, Centro Regional para Investigaciones Agrarias, Apartado Official, E-30150 La Alberca, Murcia, Spain.
Co-ordinator: Michel Etienne
INRA-Ecodevelopment Unit
Site Agroparc
F-84914 Avignon Cedex 9, France
Tel.: (33) 432 72 25 77
Fax.: (33) 432 72 25 62
Email: etienne@avignon.inra.fr
 

III. ACTIVITIES OF THE NETWORK (1997 - 2000)

a) Joint programmes between networks

In the spring of 2000, discussions concerning closer collaboration with the sheep and goat network were renewed (see Escorena meetings). The advantages of such a collaboration were emphasised, provided that collaboration between the two networks was well-balanced. Activities in common will be centred primarily in the sector of production systems. The first important activity to be undertaken together is the participation of the Network (essentially the two Mediterranean and Mountain sub-networks) at the meeting of the production systems sub-network of the sheep and goat network which will take place in Morocco in 2001. In order to ensure that future collaboration is mutually beneficial, activities should be planned well in advance and discussed in detail together.

 

b) Results

The following activities have been undertaken or completed during the past four years:

  1. A comparison of different laboratory methods for the evaluation of herbage quality (project: Quality of mountain grassland forage) was conducted by the sub-network for mountain pasture with the participation of fifteen laboratories. The results and conclusions are published in the REU Technical series No. 39 (1995) and HERBA No. 10 (1997).
  2. Biodiversity and agricultural value of mountain grassland: the results of a survey in the institutes are summarised and published in the REU Technical series No. 62 (2000). This project is no longer being followed up by the mountain pasture sub-network. However, the two other sub-networks intend to intensify research in this sector.
  3. In the past, the lowland grasslands sub-network has favoured work on leguminous plants. The results of their research and meetings are outlined in the REU Technical series No. 19 (1991), No. 29 (1993), No 42. (1996) and in HERBA No. 10 (1997).
  4. Main research results from the Mediterranean sub-network concern the state of the art of sylvo-pastoral systems (books edited following the Avignon colloquium and Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 30, 1999) and the results of advancing vegetation on the role of leguminous plants in Mediterranean agricultural production (see Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 45, 2000)
  5. Utilisation of ligneous plants. This subject has been treated on two occasions: Chania, Greece, 1993 (see REU No. 28) and by the International Occasional Symposium of the European Grassland Federation, Greece 1999 (see report HERBA No. 12, 1999).

 

Organisational difficulties and solutions:

It is important for members to keep in contact by corresponding on a regular basis. A dynamic stimulus has been currently provided by the development of e-mail which has opened new perspectives and facilitated contacts. Texts and publications can be rapidly diffused by this means of communication.

However, despite e-mail, regular meetings between the responsible members of the subnetworks and the Network co-ordinator are still necessary. Lack of funds is, nevertheless, preventing such meetings from taking place.

 

Financial constraints and solutions

Financial back-up from the FAO for Network activities is very limited, particularly for the two Lowland and Mountain sub-networks which do not benefit from CRIEAM. Information concerning the annual sum available for the management of the Network is often delayed, making planning problematic. Furthermore, it is difficult to find the money necessary for the biannual meetings of the sub-networks, important for the Central European participants, even at reasonable rates.

 

Future activities

The activities of the different sub-networks are outlined under each sub-network presentation. The Mediterranean sub-network is decided to maintain its unique Mediterranean identity, namely, that of researchers working on forage and pastoral resources. Three priority themes have been identified: optimum management of forage, the functioning of pastoral systems and the utilisation of ligneous plants. The Mountain Pasture sub-network wishes to emphasise the following three new sectors: -quality for mountain animal products; - indicators of production systems; - methods and tools of extension.

The Network will pursue its efforts for co-operation with other networks, such as the sheep and goat network, and with Eucarpia (see XIV Eucarpia Medicago spp Group Meeting, Zaragoza-Lleida 2001, Spain). The HERBA Bulletin should appear earlier in the year. Exchanges with Central Europe should be intensified; further possibilities for young scientists to study in Western Europe should be created.

.ESCORENA MEETINGS FOR   PASTURES AND FODDER CROPS NETWORK - 1996-2000 
1996
DATE VENUE TITLE Participants per country (list for all countries) Number of male (M) and female (F) participants
20-23 June Banska Bystrika (Slovakia) 9 Meeting of the Mountain Pastures Working Group Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, UK, Italy, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland 45 (M) and 8 (F)
23-24 June Banska Bystrika (Slovakia) Global Technical Workshop The same + Algeria, Egypt, Russia, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Israel, Lithuania 43 (M) and 2 (F)
25 June Banska Bystrika (Slovakia) Co-ordination Board Algeria, Egypt, France, Greece, Spain, Switzerland, Tunisia, UK, Italy 15 (M)
28-31 August Saku - Jorgeva - Tartu (Estonia) Meeting of the Working Group on Lowland Gras Recent Research and development on white clover in Europe Slovakia, Italy, Poland, Estonia, Denmark, Romania, Lithuania, Hungary, Russia, UK, Belgium, Slovenia, Netherlands, Finland, Czech Republic, Sweden, Spain, France, Japan 37 (M) and 16 (F)
1998
10-13 September Brasov (Romania) 10 Meeting of the Working Group on Mountain Pastures

Méthodes et outils pour le transfert des connaissances en milieu agricole montagnard

Albania, Belgium, Bulgaria, France,Italy, Norway, Poland, Romania,Slovakia, Spain Switzerland,Yugoslavia 49 (M) and 9 (F)
13-16 October La Coruna, Galicia (Spain) Research Conference 1998: Lowland Grasslands of Europe -Utilisation and Development Slovakia, Greece, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Romania, Lithuania, Yugoslavia, Russia, UK, Germany, Slovenia, Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, Romania, Spain, Iceland 38 (M) and 28 (F)

 

1999
Meeting of the Working Group on Medicago Portugal Spain France, Italy, Bulgaria, Torquay, Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco 22
27 30 May Thessaloniki (Greece) Grasslands an Woody Plants in Europe
22-25 November Banskâ Bystrica(Slovakia) Ecology of Grasslands Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Japan, Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine 39 (M) and 23(F)
2000
10-11 February Paris (France) Co-ordinating Meeting - FAO/CIHEAM Networks of Co- operative Research on Sheep and Goats and Pastures and Fodder Crops Belgium, France, Spain, Switzerland 8 (M)
2-9 April Sassari, Sardegna (Italy) 10 Meeting of the FAO-CIHEAM Subnetwork on Mediterranean Pastures and Fodder Crops "Legumes for Mediterranean Forage Crops, Pastures and Alternative Uses" Albania, Algeria, Australia, Chile Egypt, Spain, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Morocco, Portugal, Tunisia, Yugoslavia 132
13-17 September Luz St. Sauveur - French Pyrenees (France) Meeting of the Mountain Grassland Subnetwork - Quality and Valorisation of Animal Products in Mountain Albania Belgium Bulgaria Spain, France, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Czech Republic, Romania, UK Switzerland

 

V. PASTURES PUBLICATIONS

The "HERBA" newsletter is published once a year. For more information and subscription contact the Network co-ordinator.

 

REU Technical Series:

No. 19 White Clover Development in Europe. Proceedings 1991, 223 pp.
No. 28 Management of Mediterranean Shrublands and Related Forage Resources. Proceedings 1993, 221 pp.
No. 29 White Clover in Europe: State-of-the-Art. Proceedings 1993, 153 pp.
No. 30 Characterisation of Meadows in Mountainous Areas. Proceedings 1994, 140 pp.
No. 36 Management and Breeding of Perennial Lucerne for Diversified Purposes.
  Proceedings 1994, 194 pp.
No.39 Mountain Grassland: Biodiversity and Agricultural Value. Proceedings 1995, 151 pp
No. 42 Recent Research and Development on White Clover in Europe. Proceedings 1996,
  149 pp.
No. 57 Methods and Tools of Extension in Mountain Farms. Proceedings 2000, 218 pp.
No. 59 Role of Grazing in the Management of Agro-Pastoral Mountain Areas. Proceedings 1999, 127 pp.
No. 62 Biodiversity and Feeding Value of Mountain Grasslands in Europe. Proceedings 2000, 120 pp.
No. . . . Lowland Grasslands of Europe - Utilisation and Development. Proceedings 2000, in preparation

 

Cahier Options Méditerranéennes

Fodder Trees and Shrubs. Proceedings from the Seminar of the CEE-CAMAR project 8001CT90-0030, Palermo, Italy, 12-13 October 1992. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 4 (1994).V. Papanastasis, L. Stringi (eds.). 147 pp.

Sylvopastoral Systems: Environmental, Agricultural and Economic Sustainability. Proceedings of the Meeting of the Mediterranean Working Group of the Interregional FAO/CIHEAM Network on Pastures and Fodder Crops, Avignon, France, 29 May-2 June 1995. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 12 (1995). 280 pp.

The Genus Medicago in the Mediterranean Region: Current Situation and Prospects in Research. Proceedings of the Meeting of the Mediterranean Working Group on Medicago of the FAO/CIHEAM Interregional Research and Development Network on Pastures and Fodder Crops, Hammamet, Tunisia, 19-22 October 1995. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 18 (1996). 280 pp.

Dynamics and Sustainability of Mediterranean Pastoral Systems. Proceedings of the 9th meeting of the Mediterranean Sub-Network of the FAO-CIHEAM Inter-Regional Cooperative Research and Development Network on Pastures and Fodder Crops, Badajoz, Spain, 26-29 November 1997. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 39 (1999). 296 pp.

Legumes for Mediterranean forage crops, pastures and alternative uses. Proceedings of the 10t Meeting of the Mediterranean Sub-Network of the FAO-CIHEAM Inter-Regional Cooperative Research and Development Network on Pastures and Fodder Crops, Sassari, Italy, 4-9 April 2000. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 45 (2000). 483 pp.

 

Livre

Western European Sylvopastoral Systems. M. Etienne (ed.). INRA, CIHEAM and FAO. INRA Editions, 276 pp.

Nyon, 21 November 2000

line2.gif (403 bytes)

 

REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORK ON SUNFLOWER

The FAO Research Network on Sunflower was established in 1975. It develops four-year plans of joint research in the field of sunflower production. Plans include biennial testing of new hybrids in countries covering the sunflower cropping area in Europe, Africa, Asia and North America. During the period 1996-99 members of the Network published 70 refereed research papers and submitted over 100 technical and research papers at professional meetings and symposia. During its almost 25 years of activity, the Network has acquired a high reputation as an efficient and inexpensive way of international research cooperation in the field of sunflower production. Researchers from non-European countries actively participate in the Network's activities and it is generally considered as an entity of a global character. Several important private companies collaborate in the experimental work carried out within the Network. The Network publishes an international scientific journal "HELIA" twice a year. Each article is reviewed by two referees. It is distributed to 375 institutions and researchers in 49 countries.

The Network coordinates research and carries out field tests in studying new cultivars, agronomic traits, wild Helianthus species, cytoplasmic male sterility, use of biotechnology and sunflower diseases. Particular attention is paid to participation of researchers from developing countries.

 

I OBJECTIVES

The principal objective of the Network is to contribute to an increase in quality, volume and efficiency of the sunflower production worldwide through improved cooperation and exchange.

 

II PRESENT STRUCTURE OF THE NETWORK

a. The Network operates with the following Working Groups:

  • Experimentation of Sunflower Cultivars - A.V. Vranceanu, M. Pacuranu-Joita (Romania);
  • Evaluation of Wild Helianthus Species - G. Seiler (U.S.A.);
  • Identification Study and Utilization in Breeding. Programmes of Cytoplasmic Male Sterility (CMS) Sources - H. Serieys (France);
  • Use of Biotechnology in Sunflower Breeding - W. Friedt (Germany);
  • Genetic Study of Physiological, Biochemical and Agronomic Traits - J. Fernandez-Martinez (Spain) and J. Miller (U.S.A.);
  • Sunflower Diseases - S. Masirevic (F.R. Yugoslavia);

The Working Group: Sunflower Diseases consists of the following sub-working groups:

  1. Plasmopara halstedii - F. Viranyi (Hungary);

  2. Sclerotinia scleerotiorum - H. Iliescu (Romania);

  3. Phomopsis/Diaporthe ssp.- S. Masirevic (Yugoslavia);

  4. Verticillium ssp. - Amelia de Romano (Argentina);

  5. Macrophomina phaseolina - Alina Ionita (Romania);

  6. Altemaria ssp. - Ilona Waltz (Hungary);

  7. Phoma Macdonaldii -V. Jinga (Romania);

  8. Puccinia helianthi - T.J. Gulya (U.S.A.);

  9. Albugo tragopogonis - T.J. Gulya (U.S.A.) and G. Kong (S. Africa);

  10. Orobanche ssp. - Peppa Shindrova (Bulgaria).

Network Coordinator: Prof. Dr. Dragan Skoric, Genetics and Breeding Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, 21000 Novi Sad, M. Gorkog 30, F.R. Yugoslavia, Tel./Fax: 00381 21413 833, Email: (office): [email protected]

 

b. Objectives of the Working Groups:

1. Experimentation of Sunflower Cultivars

  • Study of the productivity, adaptability and resistance to pathogens and stress (drought) of new hybrids from two-year multi-location trials.

 

2. Evaluation of Wild Helianthus Species

  • Plant exploration for wild Helianthus species: Maintenance and characterisation; germination and dormancy; phylogeny and classification of Helianthus; interspecific hybridisation; drought tolerance; oil, oil quality and protein; disease resistance; molecular interspecific hybridisation; cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration; cytogenetics.

 

3. Identification, Study and Utilization in Breeding Programmes of new CMS Sources

  • Identification of new CMS sources; search for new restorer genes (Rf) in the Helianthus germplasm; study of the genetic determinism of the restoration of the new CMS sources; comparison of the CMS sources using genetic and molecular approaches; comparison of cytoplasmic effects for the main agronomic traits.

 

4. Use of Biotechnology in Sunflower Breeding

  • In vitro culture techniques: regeneration from explants; protoplast culture;
  • production of doubled haploids.
  • II Genetic transformation.
  • III Application of molecular methods: PCR-based marker systems, RFLPs and AFLPs; Microsatellites and approaches to molecular cloning.

 

5. Genetic Study of Physiological, Biochemical and Agronomic Traits

  • Oil and protein quality; drought tolerance, inheritance of the stay-green characteristic; genetic control of traits contributing to drought tolerance; genetic inheritance of disease resistance; genetic inheritance of seed size and seed colour.

 

6. Sunflower Diseases

  • The following topics are studied in dominant pathogens that attack sunflower: symptomatology, taxonomy, epidemiology, pathogenesis, life cycle of different pathogens, sources of resistance, genetics of resistance, inoculation methods, economic damage, preventive disease control using sunflower growing technology and chemical and biological control measures

 

III ACTIVITIES OF THE NETWORK (1997-2000)

Overall, we can be satisfied with the Network's accomplishments during the last four years. Research carried out by the Network's seven working groups has yielded significant results; results that will enhance our knowledge about sunflower and help improve the production of this important oil crop not only in Europe but worldwide as well. Based on the achieved results, therefore, the following conclusions can be made:

  1. experiments with newly developed sunflower hybrids conducted in the past four years have been part of the 11th biennial cycle (1996-1997) and the 12th biennial cycle (1998-1999). The results have confirmed the value of the new hybrids' major agronomic traits under different agroecological conditions. They also show which breeding centres in the world have made progress in developing sunflower hybrids and are helpful to sunflower breeders to determine where they stand in relation to the competition. Based on the results, sunflower producers can finally determine which hybrids should be introduced into commercial production;
  2. the Working Group: Evaluation of Wild Helianthus Species has made highly significant progress in the following areas: plant exploration for wild Helianthus species; maintenance and characterisation of wild sunflower species; phylogeny and classification of Helianthus; interspecific hybridisation; drought tolerance; oil, oil quality and protein; disease resistance, molecular interspecific hybridisation; cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration; and cytogenetics;
  3. within the Working Group: Identification, Study, and Utilization in Breeding Programmes of New CMS Sources, very good results have been obtained regarding: the identification of new CMS sources; search for new restorer genes (Rf) in the Helianthus germplasm; study of the genetic determinism of the restoration of the new CMS sources; comparison of the CMS sources using genetic and molecular approaches; and comparison of cytoplasmic effects for the main agronomic traits;
  4. the Working Group: Use of Biotechnology in Sunflower Breeding has made significant advances in solving certain problems in sunflower breeding at the tissue, cell and gene levels. Significant results have been achieved in the application of in vitro culture techniques using: regeneration from explants; protoplast culture and production of doubled haploids; genetic transformation and application of molecular methods using: PCR-based marker systems, RFLPs and AFLPs, microsatellites and approaches to molecular cloning, microsatellites and molecular cloning;
  5. on the basis of the results of the Working Group: Genetic Study of Sunflower Agronomic Traits, we have enriched our knowledge on resistance to Phomopsis, Sclerotinia and downy mildew, the three most important sunflower diseases in economic terms; then about resistance to Orobanche; traits contributing to drought tolerance; the genetic inheritance of seed size and seed colour and inheritance of the stay-green characteristic;
  6. significant results have also been achieved in the genetic study of oil and protein quality and the phenomenon of drought within the Working Group: Genetic Studies of Physiological and Biochemical Characters. Particularly important are the findings obtained in the following fields of study: development of low saturated mutants; study of the mode of inheritance of low saturated mutants; development of two high palmitic acid mutants; study of the mode of inheritance of high oleic acid and tocopherol contents; and genetic studies of oil and protein contents in the achenes.
    A study of the drought phenomenon showed that RUBISCO activity was significantly higher in drought-tolerant hybrids and the susceptibility index and harvest index under drought have been found to be excellent criteria in breeding for drought resistance.
  7. The Working Group: Studies on Population Dynamics of Sunflower Pathogens and their Control have made significant progress as well, especially after its reorganization in 1997. The most important findings have been made in the study of Orobanche spp. in Europe. No less significant are the results obtained studying Phomopsis, Verticillium, Macrophomina and Plasmopara halstedii. There has also been progress in the study of Phoma macdonaldi and Alternaria spp.
    The use of certain fungicides to control the development of certain pathogens has given positive results as well.

In the past four years, the scientific journal Helia has regularly been published twice a year. During this period, over 150 scientific and several technical papers have been published in Helia by scientific workers from a total of more than 25 countries. In 1999 a special issue of Helia devoted to the activities of the Sunflower Network was published as well. It included reports from all of the Network's technical meetings as well as a report from the last consultation held in Bulgaria in 1999. This issue of Helia gives a complete picture of the Network's activities in the last four years.

Each member of the Sunflower Network covers his/her own expenses for the scientific activities carried out. The FAO Regional Office for Europe has annually contributed US$4 000 for the Network's activities including the publication of Helia. These funds are not sufficient for the normal running of the Network. As the Network's Coordination Centre, the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops in Novi Sad, has made the largest financial contribution during the last ten years. Every year, it has spent more than US$ 10 000 for the publishing and distribution of Helia. In order for the Network to function properly in the future, reliable sources of funds need to be found. The attempt to sell advertising space in Helia has so far failed due to the lack of interest from large companies.

Most of the Network's working groups are becoming interregional in character, since scientific and technical workers from different continents are increasingly joining their programmes. In the forthcoming period, this globalisation trend should be intensified even further as it will be particularly beneficial to researchers from developing countries and hence conducive to the improvement of sunflower production in those countries as well. To enable the continuation of this process, the FAO Regional Office for Europe could contact and agree to joint support of the Network activities with other FAO regional offices so as to involve them in the Network's interregional programmes. Financial assistance from other offices would be more than welcome as it would help intensify the work of some of the working groups.

Most scientific and technical workers who founded the Sunflower Network and were at the forefront of its activities have since retired. Their place is now gradually being taken by a younger generation of scientists . In order for them to be able to continue the Network's mission and enhance its efficiency, international projects with clearly defined programmes and sources of funding need to be started within the Network.

All of the Network's participants have agreed that the planned activities of the working groups should be integrated and grouped into three or four big international projects and then submitted to international institutions to obtain funding. This way two highly significant goals would be accomplished. Firstly, the Sunflower Network would gain in quality and security when it comes to international scientific cooperation. Secondly, the practical application of its results for the purpose of advancing sunflower production worldwide would be improved and more timely.

The cooperation programmes need to be devised in such a way so as to be instrumental in finding solutions to the dominant problems facing today's sunflower production in the world. They should involve not only researchers from state-owned organisations such as institutes and universities, but also as many scientific workers from private companies as possible as this will speed up the solving of certain problems in the production of sunflower. In addition, private sunflower breeding companies should be allowed to commission and finance specific programmes. For instance, a large number of both State- and private-owned organisations must be interested to know the race composition and distribution of downy races mildew resistance in particular countries or on particular continents. I believe that a certain number of private companies would be willing not only to directly participate in such a project but to co-finance it as well. This approach could be one of the future orientations of the Network.

Another highly important matter in the forthcoming period will be to develop closer cooperation and better connection between different working groups. The appearance of new downy mildew races, for example, could be studied by three working groups: Evaluation of Wild Helianthus Species; Use of Biotechnology in Sunflower Breeding; and Studies on Population Dynamics of Sunflower Pathogens and their Control. The three groups could determine together which wild species contain genes for resistance to certain races of downy mildew. There is also a large number of other research problems that could be tackled by researchers from different working groups.

When it comes to the developing countries and improving sunflower production in them, our Network can offer certain forms of help. Let us take as an example the training of scientists from the developing countries. Specialists from particular working groups could hold seminars to provide training for researchers from the developing countries. An interesting topic for such a seminar would be: Use of Biotechnology in Sunflower Breeding; or, for instance, a seminar could be organised to study the various pathogens of sunflower and teach measures for their control. There are several possibilities for the training of researchers and sunflower producers from the developing countries. Such an effort could contribute significantly to further progress of the Sunflower Network.

With its well thought-out publishing policy and careful choice of topical scientific papers, the HELIA journal can also play an important role in solving certain problems that the world sunflower production faces today. However, the funding of HELIA needs to be increased in order to further enhance the journal's reputation in global terms, which would enable us to be even more selective when it comes to the quality of the papers we publish. The presentation of HELIA on the Internet will be one of the top priorities of the journal's editorial staff in the forthcoming period. This requires some additional funds and one of the ways to provide them could be to include a certain number of paid advertisements in the future issues of HELIA.

 

 IV MEETINGS (1997-2000)

Three technical meetings were held during 1997-2000. In 1999 the Ninth FAO Technical Consultation was held. The overview of these technical meetings and consultations is given below:

 

A. Technical Meeting

20-23 March 1997, Giessen, Germany.

At this meeting, the following working groups submitted reports on the previous two years' activities and a plan of work for the forthcoming three years:

1. Evaluation of wild Helianthus species (Dr G. Seiler);

2. Use of biotechnology in sunflower breeding (Prof. Dr. W. Friedt);

3. Identification, study and utilisation in programmes of CMS sources (Dr H. Serieys);

4. Studies on common methodologies of artificial inoculation and population dynamics of sunflower pathogens (Prof. Dr. H. Iliescu).

In addition to this, 12 scientific papers dealing with topics from fields of study covered by the said working groups were presented. Most of these papers were later published in Helia.

In total, 46 scientific workers from 13 countries participated in the meeting (Argentina - 2 (male); Australia - 1 (male); Bulgaria - 3 (two males, one female); France - 3 (male); Germany - 13 (10 males, three females); Hungary - 6 (four males, two females); Italy - 4 (male); Israel - 1 (male); Romania - 8 (three males, five females); Russia - 1 (female); Turkey - 1 (male); U.S.A. - 1 (male); and Yugoslavia - 2 (male)).

 

B. Technical Meeting

7-10 October 1997, Cairo, Egypt.

At the Meeting, the following working groups submitted reports on the previous two years' activities and a plan of work for the forthcoming three years:

1. Experimentation of sunflower cultivars (Prof. Dr A.V. Vranceanu);

2. Genetic study of sunflower agronomic traits (Prof. Dr M. Mihaljcevic;

3. Genetic study of physiological and biological characters (Prof. Dr J. Fernandez-Martinez).

Nine scientific papers were also presented at the meeting, most of which were subsequently published in Helia.

A total of 55 scientific and technical workers from eight countries took part in the meeting (Argentina - 2 (one male, one female); Bulgaria - 2 (male); Czech Rep. - 1 (male); Egypt - 27 (23 male, four female); Hungary - 9 (eight male, one female); Romania - 9 (five male, four female); Turkey - 1 (male); and Yugoslavia - 4 (all male)).

 

C. Technical Meeting

27-31 October 1998, Bucharest, Romania

At this meeting, a report on the previous three year's activities and a plan of work for the following three years was submitted for the working group:

1. Studies on population dynamics of sunflower pathogens and their control (Prof. Dr. H. Iliescu).

Seventeen scientific workers from four countries attended the meeting (Argentina - 2 (one male, one female); Hungary - 1 (one female); Romania - 10 (six male, four female); and Yugoslavia - 4 (all male)).

 

D. Ninth Technical Consultation of the European Cooperative Research Network on Sunflower

27-20 July 1999, Dobrich, Bulgaria

1 At the Meeting held in Dobrich, detailed reports on the previous four years' activities and a plan of work for the forthcoming four years were presented.

The Coordinator summarised the Network's activities for 1995-1999. All six working groups presented a more detailed progress report.

At this Consultation, each of the working group leaders submitted a programme proposal for the forthcoming four years, which was then discussed in detail and adopted. In addition, a number of scientific papers, later to be published in Helia, were presented.

Ninety-seven scientific and technical workers from 14 countries participated (Argentina - 3 (one male, two female); Bulgaria - 36 (18 male, 18 female); France - 9 (seven male, two female); Germany - 1 (female); Hungary - 4 (three male, one female); Italy - 1 (male); Moldova - 5 (four male, one female); Romania - 17 (11 male, six female); Russia - 8 (seven male, one female); Spain 2 male); Turkey - 3 (two male, one female); Ukraine - 1 (male); U.S.A. - 3 (male); and Yugoslavia 4 (male).

 

V PUBLICATIONS (1997-2000)

A large number of the Sunflower Network's scientific and technical results appeared in print in the scientific journal Helia, which is published biannually. During the 1997-2000 period, in addition to the journal's regular issues, two special issues were also published, namely:

1. Helia, Special Issue: Fourth European Conference on Sunflower Biotechnology. 20-23 October 1998. Montpellier, France. Helia, Vol. 22. No. 30:1-266. May 1999. Novi Sad.

2. Helia, Special Issue: Activities of the European Cooperative Research Network on Sunflower (1996-1999). Volume 22: 1-586. December, 1999. Novi Sad.

 

VI MAJOR LINKS TO INFORMATION ON NETWORK ACTIVITIES AND/OR NETWORK MEMBERS

To date, the flow of information within the Network has taken the following forms: direct contacts (emails and letters) between the Coordinator and the working group leaders. Each working group leader contacted the group's participants directly. Major contacts have been realised through participation in the technical meetings and consultations (held every four years). Another important outlet for communication within the Network is the scientific journal Helia. Comprehensive web presentations of the Sunflower Network and Helia are also being prepared.

line2.gif (403 bytes)

 

REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORK ON FLAX AND OTHER BAST PLANTS

At present, the Network brings together 330 experts from 48 countries in the fields of research, economics, marketing and industry. It also includes members from non-European countries - experts from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Egypt, India, Mexico, Nigeria, South Africa, Thailand and the USA have applied to become members.

 

I. OBJECTIVES OF THE NETWORK

The objectives of the Network are to promote research and development, and the exchange of experience, scientific data and information in the field of production, processing and marketing of flax and other bast plant products and to facilitate collaboration and knowledge sharing between researchers and professionals from agriculture, industry and trade. The Working groups work to realise the Network's objectives in the more specific fields of their selected topics.

 

II. PRESENT STRUCTURE OF THE NETWORK

a. Presently, the network consists of six working groups:

  • WG1: Breeding and Plant Genetic Resources-M. Pavelek (Czech Republic) AGRITEC, Research, Breeding & Services, Zemedelska 16, 787 01 Sumperk, The Czech Republic, tel. +420 649 382 106, fax +420 649 382 999, Email: [email protected]
  • WG/2: Extraction and Processing - M. Tubach (Germany) Institut fur Angewandte Forschung (IAF), Fachhochschule Reutlingen, Alteburgstr. 150, D-72762 Reutlingen, Germany, Tel. ++49/7121/271-536, Fax. ++49/7121/271-537, Email: [email protected]
  • WG/3: Economics and Marketing - A. Daenekindt (Belgium) Secretariat: Algemeen Belgisch Vlasverbond, Oude Vestingsstraat 15, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium tel.: +32/ 56 22 02 61, fax: +32/56 22 79 30,
    Email: [email protected]
  • Quality - S. Sharma (United Kingdom) The Queen's University of Belfast, Department of Applied Science, Faculty of Agriculture & Food Science, Newforge Lane. Belfast BT9 5PX , N. Ireland, tel.: +44/ 1232 250 666, fax: +44/1232 668375, Email: [email protected]
  • Non-Textile Applications- R. Kozlowski (Poland) - the Network Coordinator
  • Biology and Biotechnology - C. Morvan (France) Universitd de Rouen, Scueor Ura 203 CNRS , 76821 Mont Saint-Aignan Cedex, France, tel.: +33/ 2/35146751 fax: +33/ 2/ 35705520, Email: [email protected]

 

Coordinator:

Prof Dr. Ryszard Kozlowski, Institute of Natural Fibres, Ul Wojska Polskiego 71b, 60-630 Poznan" Poland Tel.: 48 61 8480 061, Fax: 48 61 8417 830, Email: [email protected]

The Coordination Centre of the network is at the Institute of Natural Fibres, Poznan, Poland. Secretary of the Centre and to the network is Ms. Maria Mackiewicz-Talarczyk Email: [email protected] Special contact points for researchers in other regions are:

for Latin America:
Alcides Leao Universidade Estadul Paulista SP18603-970 Botucatu, Brazil Tel.: 55 14 821 3883 Fax.: 55 14 821 3438 Email:[email protected] and [email protected]

for North America:
Paul P. Kolodziejczyk, Ph.D. New Crops & New Products Olds College Centre for Innovation 4500 - 50th Street, Olds, Alberta, Canada T4H 1R6, Tel.: (403) 507-7970 Fax: (403) 507-7977, Email: [email protected]

for the Near East Region:
Dardiri Mohamed El-Hariri National research centre El-Tahrir str. Dokki, Cairo, Egypt Tel.: 202 33 77164 Fax.: 202 33 7931 Email: [email protected]

b. objectives of the working groups:

WG/1: Breeding and Plant Genetic Resources:

  • flax genetic resources: analysis, protection and maintenance, International Flax Data Base (IFDB)- an international register of flax/linseed collections, its characterisation, evaluation, description and development, breeding of bast plants

WG/2: Extraction and Processing

  • development in bast plants harvesting, controlled retting process, improvement of scutching, new ways of decortication, improvement of spinning.

WG/3: Economics and Marketing

  • providing information about: areas of flax and other bast plants sown in the world, fibre yield, yield of linseed, market prices of fibre and linseed, import, export of flax fibre and allied bast fibres.

WG/4: Quality

  • comparing data and measurements, organoleptic and instrumental quality methods, defining a unified vocabulary on quality and establishing standards and testing methodology. The Research cooperative work was conducted within 3 stages of the European Inter-Laboratory Testing - Round Robin Test (unified assessment of non - retted and retted flax straw, flax fibre) and quality evaluation by traditional, chemical and instrumental methods.

WG/5: Non-textile Applications

  • recognition, elaboration and implementation of novel non-textile applications of bast plants and fibres and brand nee. diversified types of by-products

WG/6: Biology and Biotechnology

  • recognition and development in scope of bast plants: biochemistry and biotechnology, biology, cell physiology, microbiology and enzymology, gene identification, plant regeneration and transformation, disease resistance

 

III. ACTIVITIES OF THE NETWORK (1997-2000)

Summing up: the Network had organised 7 international conferences and coorganized 5 international conferences dealing with natural fibres. Published 6 proceedings of the international conferences and 7 issues of the EUROFLAX information bulletin.

Results

1. Major achievements in special research areas for efforts between working groups and by individual working groups

  • WG/1 prepared and is developing the International Flax Data Base (IFDB) - an international register of flax/linseed collections; contemporary state 1416 accessions, based on the international discussion in order to standardise the passport data, to unify the descriptors for special traits and to evaluate individual characters.
  • WG/2 promotes studies on diversification of uses, technologies of harvesting, extraction and processing of bast fibres, actively contributing to the organisation of the symposia and conferences
  • WG/3 conducts analyses of the linen and other bast plants market and world trends in production and
  • consumption of these products. The Group is collecting the statistical data on bast fibres and bast plants, presented in the EUROFLAX Newsletter-network's information bulletin.
  • WG/4 assessed statistically and printed results of the Round Robin Test-the European Inter-lab Test described earlier.
  • WG/5 promotes research and development in the field of novel non-textile applications of flax, hemp and other bast plants and their by-products, sharing the relevant knowledge through dissemination of conference materials
  • WG/6 shares knowledge in scope of biology and biotechnology.

The Network established good links with Latin America, contributing to the development of those countries in scope of natural fibres, e.g. the Institute of Natural Fibres helps to create the Centre for Information, Research and Industrial Development of Natural Fibres in Ecuador. INF has organised several exhibitions for the representatives of Latin America Embassies in Poland to enlarge the knowledge about novel diversified applications of natural fibres and its potential for Latin America.

Within the period of 1997-2000 the Network enlarged actively its scope of activities by including topics joint with hemp and other bast plants as jute, kenaf, ramie as well as new, promising lignocellulosic tropical plants.

The Network started its efforts toward globalisation many years ago by including new plants which are grown and processed not only in Europe and by incorporating participants from 16 nonEuropean countries. The Network intends to act as the Interregional Network due to the above mentioned reasons. The European Cooperative Research Network on Flax and Other Bast Plants establishes links with the

Cotton Network, intending to share and compare the achievements in scope of e.g. bioprocessing of fibres and

materials.

The close cooperation of the Coordination Centre with the FAO Intergovernmental Group on Jute, Kenaf and Allied Fibres as well as Intergovernmental Group on Hard Fibres resulted in the continuos participation of the Network Coordinator in the meetings of these Groups as well in co-organisation and hosting of the FAO Intersessional Consultation on Fibres by the Institute of Natural Fibres (15-16.11.2000).

The Network's members and the Coordination Centre are active in the co-operation and work within the following EU projects:

  • COST Action 847: Textile Quality and Biotechnology (within COST- European Co-operation do the Field of Scientific and Technical Research. The Network's scientists are active in the work of two Working.
    Groups: WG/1 "Quality assessment of natural fibres" (chaired by S. Sharma) and WG/2 "Bioprocessing of Bast Fibres" (chaired by R. Kozlowski). They are contributing to establishing unified quality assessment of bast fibres in Europe as well as to develop environmentally friendly production technologies for textile industry by using enzymatic processes.
  • IENICA INFORRM: The Interactive European Network for Industrial Crops and their Applications in the Changing Millennium (within Concerted Actions). The IENICA report on industrial crops and their applications is available and it is the first market-driven overview of the prospects for alternative crops and the industrial crop situation in Europe. It contributes to accessing and discovering the fascinating potential Europe has at its disposal in creating more sustainable industrial growth for future generations.
  • Thematic Network for Wood Modification (within Thematic Networks)The Networks' members have prepared the project: EUROBIOFLAX -Utilization of European Germplasm Biodiversity for Improving and Increasing of Sustainable Flax Production in Europe. The project is under further European Commission evaluation.

2. Major achievements in obtaining external financial support for network activities and working group activities. The activity of the Network's Coordination Centre in Poznan is supported financially by Polish State Committee for Scientific Research. Additionally the members of WG/2 and WG/4 managed to find some financial support to their attendance to the meetings joint with quality assessment of bast fibres and bioprocessing of bast fibres thanks to the elaboration and acceptance of the EU project COST Action 847: Textile Quality and Biotechnology.

3.and 4. Organisational and financial difficulties and solutions. The Network experiences difficulties in organising the conferences outside Europe, due to financial constraints; the events of the European Network outside Europe are not supported financially by the Regional Office for Europe. We experience the same problems with supporting the attendance to the events in Europe of the Network representatives e.g. from Egypt. Coordination Centre hopes that this situation could be solved by nominating the Network to the Interregional Network. Among other profits, it would give a chance for Europe to sell know-how and technologies to developing countries in scope of natural fibres.

5. Future activities for cross-working group themes and by working group:

 

Future Plans of the FAO European Cooperative Research Network on Flax and other Bast Plants 2001

1. The Scientific Session "Quality Assessment of Natural Fibres"- in conjunction with the European

  1. Commission Project: COST ACTION 847, January 29, 2001, Institute of Natural Fibres, Poznan, Poland
  2. (organised by Coordination Centre and WG/1)
  3. The Scientific Session "Bioprocessing of Bast Fibres"- in conjunction with the European Commission Project: COST ACTION 847, January 30, 2001, Institute of Natural Fibres, Poznan, Poland (organised by Coordination Centre and WG/2)
  4. The Second Global Workshop (the Second General Consultation) together with Workshops of six Working Groups, June 3-6, 2001, Borovets (near Sofia), Bulgaria (organised by Coordination Centre and WG/1) 4. Sixth International Conference on Frontiers of Polymers and Advanced Materials, March 4-9, 2001 Recife, Brazil (R. Kozlowski-the Chairman of the Session: Technology Transfer and International Collaboration 4. International Conference: "Bast Fibrous Plants at the Turn of the Second and Third Millennium", Shenyang, China, September 18-22, 2001 (organised by Coordination Centre) 2002 1. Workshop of the Breeding, Cultivation and Plant Genetic Resources Working Group WG/1, September 2002, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republic of Srpska. Written acceptance of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic (organised by Coordination Centre and WG/1)
  5. 2. International Conference on Modern Processing and Application of Lignocellulosic Raw Materials, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt (organised by Coordination Centre and WG/1 and WG/2)

 

IV. MEETINGS (1997-2000) -see enclosed

 

V. PUBLICATIONS (1997-2000)- see enclosed

 

VI. Major links to information on network activities and/or network members

  1. http://www.fao.org/regional/europe/scorena/flacrop.html [ESCORENA, FAO, Rome -Network website]
  2. http://iwn.infpoznan.pl [Institute of Natural Fibres, Poznan, Poland]
  3. http: //www.csl.gov.uk/ienica [IENICA - Interactive European Network for Industrial Crops and their Applications in the Changing Millennium]
  4. websites of the Network Chairmen:
  • http://www.agritec.cz [AGRITEC, Sumperk, the Czech Republic]
  • http://www.fh-reutlingen.de [Institut fur Angewandte Forschung (IAF), Reutlingen, Germany]
  • http://www.gub.ac.uk [The Queen's University of Belfast] http://www.univ-rouen.fr/ [Université de Rouen]
  • http://www.hemptech.com/hnews.html [Hemptech: The Hemp Information Network ]

 

SOURCES OF STATISTICAL DATA

http://apps.fao.org FAOSTAT Database Results],
http://www.texdata.com,
http://www.its-publishing.com

 

Flax Meetings -1996-2000
Conferences and Meetings of the European Cooperative Research Network on Flax and other Bast Plants
Note: new data are given in black letters
1996
DATE VENUE and TITLE Number of male (M) and female participants
22 February Wageningen (The Netherlands) Third Workshop of WG/4 Quality WG (WG4) 22 experts from 6 countries: M (16), F (6), Belgium (3), France (4), Germany (7), Poland (4), The Netherlands(3), U.K.(1)
23 February Wageningen, (The Netherlands) Coordinating Board Meeting and Panel of Experts 10 experts from 5 countries: M (8), F (2) Belgium (1), France (3), Italy (1), Poland 4 , and UK (1)
19 July Paris (France) Coordination Board Meeting and Panel of Experts 8 experts from 6 countries: Belgium M (7), F (1) (1), Czech Republic (1), France (2), Italy 1 ,Poland 2 , UK 1
24 September Rouen (France) Coordinating Board Meeting and Panel of Experts 8 experts from 6 countries: M (6), F (2) Belgium (1), Czech Republic (1), France (2), Italy (1), Poland (2), UK (1)
25-28 September Rouen (France) Global Technical Workshop 220 participants from 29 countries: M (185), F (35)
Austria (1), Belarus (1), Belgium (19), Brazil (1), Bulgaria (1), Canada (4), The Czech Republic (6), Egypt (1), Estonia (1), Finland (3), France (81), Germany (9), Hungary (1), Iceland (1), Italy (5), Latvia (1), Lithuania (4), Netherlands (7), Northern Ireland (4), Norway (2), Poland (37), Romania (2), Russia (5), South Africa (1), Spain (1), Sweden (2), Ukraine 2 , U.K. (10 , USA 7 .
1997 .
29 September Poznan (Poland) Second Workshop of Extraction and Processing WG (WG2) 28 persons from 12 countries; viz. from: Belgium (1) Canada (1), China (2), Czech Republic (1), Egypt (1), France (3), Iceland (2), the Netherlands (2), Poland (9), UK (1), Ukraine 3 , and the USA 2 M (25), F (3)
30 September -1 October Poznan (Poland) Flax and Other Bast Plants Symposium 173 attendees from 25 countries: Austria (1), Australia (4), Belarus (1), Belgium (1), Bulgaria (1), Canada (3), China (2), the Czech Republic (7), Denmark (3), Egypt (1), France (3), Finland (23), Germany (16), Hungary (3), Iceland (3), Italy (5), the Netherlands (3), Norway (1), Poland (60), Russia (8), Spain (2), Sweden (4), UK (3), Ukraine (10), USA (5). M (129), F (44)
30 September -1 October Poznan (Poland)Fifth Workshop of the Quality WG (WG4) 15 experts from 8 countries: Canada (1), the Czech Republic (1), Egypt (1), Germany (2), Iceland(1), the Netherlands (1), Poland (7) and Ukraine (1) M (10), F (5)
1998
10-12 August Tampere (Finland)Sixth Workshop of Quality WG(WG4) 52 delegates 12 countries: the Czech Republic (3), Denmark (4), Finland (14), France (3), Germany (4), Iceland (2), Netherlands (3), Poland (11), South Africa (1), Sweden -M , UK 2), USA .U2 M (32), F (20)
24-25 September Poznan (Poland) Symposium on Hemp and Other Bast Fibrous Plants: Production, Technology and Ecology 62 participants from 13 countries: Belgium (1), Brazil (4), China (3), Czech Republic (3), Egypt (1), Finland (1), Germany (4), Hungary (2), Poland (37), Switzerland (1), Thailand (1), UK (2), and the USA (2) M (43), F (19)
28-30 September St. Petersburg (Russia Fed.) Bast Fibrous Plants Today and Tomorrow Breeding, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Beyond the 21st Century 75 experts from 22 countries: Australia (1), Belarus (4), Brazil (1), Bulgaria (1), Canada (3), China (3), Czech Republic (4), Egypt (1), Finland (1), France (4), Germany (1), Hungary (1), Italy (3), Latvia (2), Lithuania (2), Netherlands (5), Poland (12), Portugal (1), Republica Srpska (2); Russia (21), Thailand 1 , UK 1 M (48), F (27)
1999
21-25 June Poznan (Poland)Fifth International Conference on Frontiers of Polymers and Advanced Materials (ICFPAM) and NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Polymers and Composite for Special Applications (The Workshop of the WG/2 "Non-Textile Applications) 167 experts from 33 countries: Argentina (1), Australia (2), Austria (3), Brazil (3), Canada (1), Chile (2), Czech Republic (2), Denmark (1), Egypt (8), Finland (2), France (15), Germany (5), India (1), Indonesia (1), Israel (1), Italy (2), Japan (6), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia(1), Lithuania (1), Moldova Republic (1), Poland (50), Romania (1), Russia (2), Slovak Republic(1), South Korea (8), Spain (1), Sweden (2), Switzerland (2), The Netherlands (1), Turkey (1), UK (2), Ukraine (4), USA (33) M (139), F (28)
15-16 November Poznan (Poland)Intersessional Consultation on Fibres 28 participants from 12 countries: Bulgaria (1), Brazil (4), China (1), Czech Republic (2), Ecuador (1), Germany (3), India (1), Indonesia (1), Pakistan (2), Poland (6), Sri Lanka 2 , UK 2 M (23), F (6)
2000
23 February Poznan (Poland) Seminar: Innovative Hemp Production and New Hemp Products (The News in Hemp Breeding, Cultivation, Harvesting and Processing) 52 persons from 5 countries: China (1),Czech Republic (3),Germany (4), Poland (42), Sweden (2)   M (23), F (29)
14-17 May San Paulo (Brazil) Third International Symposium on Natural Polymers and Composites - ISNaPol 2000 Simultaneously: WG2 Extraction and Processing: Workshop on Progress in Production and Processing of Cellulosic Fibres and Natural Polymers Attendees of FAO Workshop: 80 persons from 16 countries Argentine (10), Brazil (12), Canada (3), Chile (4), China (1), Ecuador (1), France (5), Germany (2), India (2), Italy (2), Japan (1), Poland (24), Sweden (2), United Kingdom 5 , USA 4 and Yugoslavia 2 M(46), F (34)
28 June Poznan (Poland) International Scientific Session: "Natural Fibres Today and Tomorrow" Attended by 135 persons from 11 countries: Canada (2), China (2), Czech Republic (3), Ecuador (6), Egypt (1), France (1), Germany (8), Poland (105), Russia (4), UK (2), and the USA 1 . M(103), F (32)
12-13 October Helsinki The Management Committee Meeting with attendance of network's members involved in COST Action 847: Textile Quality and Biotechnology 15 participants from Austria (1), Belgium (1), Finland (2), France (1), Germany (1), Hungary (2), Netherlands (1), Poland (2), Portugal 2 , Romania 1 , UK 1 M (11), F(4)

line2.gif (403 bytes)

 

INTERREGIONAL COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORK ON COTTON 1996-2000

The Network was established in April 1938. The main achievements of the Network are the establishment of a common collection of 260 accessions and a list of available cotton germplasm, a study on factors influencing behaviour of varieties, an inventory of growth regulators, analysis of correlation between quality parameters and the first results in the use of biotechnology in the development of new cotton cultivars.

Curing the period 1996-98 the Network organised one technical consultation in Montpellier, France, 2-5 October 1996 (51 participants from 18 countries), one workshop which was attended by coordinators of working groups and selected experts, Bari, Italy, 14-20 July 1998 (27 participants from 10 countries) and a meeting of the Biotechnology Group, 6-12 September 1998, Athens, Greece (28 participants from 16 countries). The Network is composed of participants from 16 countries, with the occasional participation of researchers from another 9 countries from other regions (e.g. Brazil, China, India, USA). The Network maintains close cooperation with the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) and sometimes receives support through ICAC. Participating institutions are also involved in research projects carried out under the auspices of ICAC.

The Third Consultation in 1996, reviewed activities of working groups on cotton breeding, variety trials, growth regulators, cotton nutrition, integrated pest management, biotechnology and cotton technology. New working groups were established.

In the general conference during September 2000, the activities of the WGs have been reviewed. Retired or non active chairmen have been replaced and future activities for the next one or two year have been reported. Official report can be seen here.

 

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the Network are to develop research cooperation in fields related to cotton production and problems, in Mediterranean climatic conditions. The main form of cooperation is the exchange of information on research results and of cotton germplasm, common variety trials and projects.

 

COORDINATOR: Urania Kechagia, NAGREF, Cotton and Industrial Plants Institute, 574 00 Sindos Thessaloniki, Greece. Tel.: 30 31 79 94 44. Fax.: 30 31 79 65 13. Email: [email protected]

 

STRUCTURE

The current structure consists of the following working groups

  • Cotton Breeding (WG 1)
  • Variety Trials (WG 2)
  • Growth Regulators WG 3)
  • Cotton Nutrition (WG 4)
  • Modeling (WG 5)
  • Water Management (WG 6)
  • Crop Protection (WG 7)
  • Cotton Technology (WG 8)
  • Biotechnology (WG 9)
  • Economy (WG 10)

 

WG1

The Working Group promotes the exchange of information on research in cotton breeding. It prepared a list of germplasm collections having 260 accessions along with their morphological and fibre quality characteristics and mediated in germplasm exchange among its members.

The Working Group intends to continue the exchange of information on research in cotton breeding and evaluation of modern breeding methods, jointly strive for obtaining improved varieties for various zones and establish a central germplasm bank for cotton.

CHAIRMAN: F. Xanthopoulos, NAGREF, Cotton and Industrial Plants Institute, 574 00 Sindos Thessaloniki, Greece, Tel.: 30 31 79 94 44. Fax.: 30 31 79 65 13. Email: [email protected]

 

WG2

The Working Group completed two rounds of variety trials which included factors affecting varietal performance in addition to yields. Another set of trials (jointly with WG8), included cottonseed yield, ginning outturn and fiber characteristics. Performance tests under various climatic conditions and data collected during trials have been recognised as a valuable knowledge base of the plant material in use by participating Member Nations. Two publications of the variety trial group including the results of the two rounds of trials have been issued till 1006, providing an important amount of information on commercial varieties of the Mediterranean area.

The Working Group intends to continue trials with the view to obtaining more homogenous data on crop phenology, days of squaring, days of blooming, days of boll opening, height to node ratio, in addition to yields and quality characteristics. Thus, another round of variety trials will start in 2601. About 1216 varieties will be tested in 6-10 countries for two years. The same methology would be applied in all countries and the same data would be recorded on all varieties.

Verticillium wilt is the most serious disease in most of the member countries and a common strategy would be adapted to face this problem.

The working groups on variety trials and plant growth modeling will work together to have at least one variety studied for its functioning and growth pattern.

CHAIRMAN: O. Gencer, Cotton Research and Application Centre, Cukurova University, 01330 Adana, Turkey, Tel.: 90 332 33 86797. Fax.: 90 332 3386797. Email: [email protected]

 

WG 3

The Working Croup has completed a survey on the use of plant growth regulators, the status of research and current research projects on growth regulators in Member Nations. Recently it has conducted a cooperative project on newly introduced growth regulators and prepared a review of literature on this subject. Use of regulators as a production management tool will be studied in interaction with fertilisers and other agronomic measures. Already a study of two growth retardant application in interaction with N has been completed.

CHAIRMAN: K. Kosmidou-Dimitropoulou (she will retire soon and she will be replaced by the V. Chairman), Hellenic Cotton Board, Planning and Research Division, 150 Syrgou Avenue, 17671 Athens, Greece, Tel.: 301 922 5011 --15. Fax.: 30 1 924 36 76. Email: [email protected]

VICE CHAIRMAN: P. Epthimiadis Agr. Univ. of Athens lera Odos 75, Athens Greece Tel:0030-1-9714901 Fax:00301-9700235

 

WG4

The Working Group is active in studying nutritional requirements of cotton under various conditions, diagnostic measures and application and use of foliar fertilizers and micronutrients with the aim of optimizing cotton nutrition and increasing the efficiency of cotton nutrient use.

A collaboration among this group and the variety trials has been planted focused on variety -- fertiliser interaction. This group has also a close collaboration with WG3.

CHAIRMAN: M. El Fouly, Botany Department, National Research Centre, El-Tahrir Street, Cairo, Dokki, PL. 12622, Egypt, Tel.: 20 2 3365223. Fax.: 20 2 3610850. Email: [email protected]

 

WG5

Cotton modeling had added as an ad-hoc group after the consultation in Montpellier. The group has few members and if membership and interest is not increased in the next year the group has to merge with the WG2 or WG.

A joined research with variety trials group has been planted for a study of fruiting and growth pattern of the varieties included in the common trials.

CHAIRMAN: M. Cretenet, CIRAD-CA, B.P. 5035, 34000 Montpellier, France, Tel.: 33 467 615800. Fax.: 33 467 520625. Email: [email protected]

 

WG6

Although water management is among the most important parameters, the group has not shown any activity so far. Till 1996 Iran had the chairmanship which was passed to Israel from 1996. Unfortunately J. Spencer, a well-known specialist on the subject was appointed in Australia and was replaced by Dr. Baniani (in the recent meeting). In the next two years the group must be activated otherwise it has to merge with WG4.

CHAIRMAN: Dr. Ebadollah Baniani, Cotton Research Department, Varamin Seed and Plant Improvement Center, Cotton Fiber Res. Department, 33716 Varamin, Iran, Tel: 0098-291-44023. Fax: 0098-291-44024

 

WG7

Also a very important topic for cotton but not activities have been reported so far. After the replacement of the chairman by professor Gerling and professor Sekeroglu we expect to enhance activities. A priority for the future would be weed control and insecticide resistance management. IPM will be applied as an intedisciplinary approach involving researchers from other working groups. A subject that will also attract the attention is the study of dynamics of populations of aphids and Bemisia which will become a possible threat after the use of Bt cotton.

CHAIRMAN: Dan Gerling, Department of Zoology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel, Tel: 00972-36408611. Fax: 00972-36407830 or 6409403. Email:[email protected]

VICE-CHAIRMAN: Erdal Sekeroglu, Dept. of Plant Protection, Cucurova University, Agricultural Faculty, 01330 Adana, Turkey, Tel:0090-322-3386759. Fax:0090-322-3386369. Email: [email protected]

 

WG8

A joined research activity with the variety trials group was focused on the variety-environment interaction and the respective effect on fiber quality. The most important parameters affecting spinning performance have been analysed and the merit of variety or environment in each one has been defined for the varieties and the parameters under study. The quality evaluation has been performed in two laboratories in standard conditions. Standardisation f fiber quality parameters among the different laboratories was undertaken as well as comparisons have been made between new (HVI) and conventional instrument. Recommendations for highly efficiency in testing of fiber quality have been distributed among members and two research papers are reporting for the old and new instrument. Cotton stickiness is given priority and separate meetings on this subject would take place (Ghent, November 2000, Lille, February 2001 ).

CHAIRMAN: J.-P. Gourlott, CIRAD, B. P. 5035, 34032 Montpellier, Prance, Tel.: 33 467 615375. Fax.: 33 467 615667. Email: [email protected]

 

WG9

The Working Group held its last technical workshop during the World Cotton Conference in Athens, Greece (6-12 September 1998). The Group also maintains an informal discussion group.

Dr. Momtaz intetified the following objectives for biotechnology group.

  • Establish of role of phytohormones in the development of long-staple fibers
  • Determine the effect of environmental parameters on the growth and development of long-staple cotton fibers.
  • Enhance expression of fiber genes determined to be regulated by phytohormones
  • Ultimately, engineer cotton with gene constructs with potential to improve quality parameters.
  • Search for gene transcripts differentially expressed in fibers in response to phytohormones.
  • Characterise differentially expressed transcripts.
  • Isolate clones form fiber cDNA library and/or genomic library that represent fiber gene transcripts that are hormonally regulated in their expression.

CHAIRMAN: O. Momtaz, Agricultural Genetic Engineering Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, 9 Gama street, Giza 12619, Egypt, Tel.: 0 2 5727831. Fax.: 20 2 5689519. Email: [email protected]

 

WG10

The group was formed after 1996 as ad-hoc. So far the chairman Dr. Raymond made a directory including member and also topics for research. He in the meantime retired and replaced by Dr. Fok. The group under the new chairman decided to update membership and redefine the objectives and targets to include issues like analysis and assessment of income of cotton producers and economic analysis of cotton production systems. Although new the group is very active with many members and in the near future promised to organise a symposium on a particular topic. The WG will study the cotton sectors and policies in various countries.

CHAIRMAN: Michel Fok, CIRAD-CA, U. R. Economie des Filieres, P.B. 5035, 34032 Montpellier Cedex France, Tel.: 33 457 515606. Fax.: 33 467 615560. Email: [email protected]

 

Meetings
DATE VENUE TITLE
2-5 October 1996 Montpellier, France Technical Consultation
14-20 July 1998 Bari, Italy Joint meeting of WG1, 2, 3, 4, 8
6-12 September 1998 Athens, Greece Meeting of WG9
20-24 September 2000 Adana, Turkey Meeting of all WGs

Future meetings

  • Creta, Greece, 2001. All WG chairmen, national coordinators and meeting of WG4, WG6, WG7 and WG9.
  • 2002. All WGs. Date and place will be fixed later.

 

Publications (1997-2000)

Report of the Third Technical Consultation of the Interregional Cooperative Research Network on Cotton held in Montpellier, France, 2-5 October 1996.

Proceedings of joint meeting of working groups WG1, WG2, WG3, WG4 and WG8, Bari Italy, 14-20 July 1998 and meeting of WG9 in Athens, 6-12 September 1998.

Proceedings of joint meeting of all working groups, Adana Turkey 20-24 September 2000. (in press).

line2.gif (403 bytes)

 

SUMMARY OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SUSTAINABLE RURAL ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY NETWORK (SREN) 1996-2000

Since 1996, SREN held one workshop in 1996 and 1998 each, six in 1997 and three in 1999 and 2000 each. This includes two coordination meetings in 1997 and 2000. The Proceedings of the 1998 and 1999 workshop of the Organic Farming Working Group 6 have been finalised as REU Technical Series 58 and 63. The Proceedings of the Biomass Working Group 3 (WG 3) meeting in 1997 have been published in 1998 by James & James as part of the Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Agriculture for Food, Energy and Industry. Proceedings of the two workshops in June 1999 have been published by the organiser in the proceedings of the conference "Energy and Agriculture Towards the Third Millennium". A total of six REU Technical Series and two independently published proceedings have been produced.

In addition, a small project was started in Oct. 1998 under the leadership of the Bundesforschungsanstalt fur Landwirtschaft, Braunschweig-Volkenrode (FAL), Germany, on the development of design and evaluation methods and preparation of an Integrated Energy Farm System, which produces energy and food for its own needs and the market.

The Network's strongest activities are still related to renewable energy production and use. The largest and most active working groups are Working Group 2 on Environmental Aspects of Anaerobic Treatments and Working Group 3 on Biomass for Energy and the Environment. At the last coordination meeting in Braunschweig it was decided to phase out Working Group 5 on Animal Traction. The Decentralised Energy WG 1 is being reoriented towards a more Mediterranean focus on water and energy related issues.

Working Group 4 on Pollination and Pollinator Diversity Management is focussing on issues related to biodiversity in agricultural production systems and landscape management. During their last meeting in 2000 in Hungary and the workshop of the FAO International Pollinator Initiative its activities were geared to integrate into the new framework of this Initiative related to the Biodiversity Conference.

The addition to SREN in 1998 of Working Group 6 on Research Methodologies in Organic Farming - now Organic Farming Research, has strengthened the integrative concept of the network and is expected to also benefit the production methods of the Biomass for Energy Working Group. This WG is dynamically developing several activities (see also the table below) and facilitated and later will collaborate in a major research data base project.

In 2000, Mr J. Greef was elected the new coordinator:

GREEF, J. Institute of Crop and Grassland Science, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Bundesallee 50, D-38116 Braunschweig - Volkenrode, GERMANY, Tel.: (49) 531 596 365, Email: [email protected]

 

Funding

Funding sources are the FAO Regular Programme, the SREN Trust Fund (GCP/INT/393/MUL) and other ad hoc outside funding. Examples for the latter are for example the contributions of the institutions organising workshops (e.g. CIHEAM-IAMB for September 1999), or like in 1998 additional funds made available by the Swiss Development Cooperation for the workshop of WG 6 and funds from another project for the Integrated Energy Farm project of WG 3.

Generally funding is divided evenly between the Regular Programme budget and the Trust Fund and activities are spread over the whole biennium. Due to a number of postponements during 1998, every working group had planned a meeting in 1999. Working groups generally meet once every two years.

 

Future development

The network is working on integrating a variety of relevant research topics into a coherent collaborative effort on the improvement of the rural environment of which rural energy production and use will remain an important focus. In the long-term, this effort would account for the multi-functional character of agriculture in the context of rural development, biodiversity and resource conservation, landscape management, and production and marketing diversification. It is envisioned that low-input and organic production methods will play a major role in this development.

This relatively difficult to organise "across-issues" approach will require skilful coordination and more funds than at present available. Working groups that do not fit into this broader yet different orientation, i.e. no longer exclusively renewable energy, are being phased out or reoriented. In line with the new orientation of the ESCORENA system, new funding sources are being sought, such as specific project or activity support, private sector involvement and funding from the European Commission for individual but collaborative research projects. The continuation of contributions to the Trust Fund by Member Governments plays a key role in facilitating this search for other resources and in providing seed money to collaborative efforts later funded through other sources.

The distinctly different organisation and approach of this network make it a worthwhile effort, which, will create a model for organising collaboration to integrate the multi-subject and multi-disciplinary areas necessary for a truly sustainable agricultural system in Europe or elsewhere. Attached is a list of present and planned project activities of SREN.

SREN Project activities - Present and Planned

Objective Present Status and Funding Phase II (short-term: 2001-2003) Phase III (mid-term: 2004-2007)
Project 1)
Improve income security, production diversity and sustainability of food and energy production in agriculture; more concretely: prepare feasibility models, demonstration farms and implementation guidelines for integrated energy and food production systems; integrating also the results from projects 2), 3) and others Feasibility and first models established; first experimental farm infrastructure established; proposal for Phase II in final state of preparation; funding received from FAO at the end of1998 - 23.000 US$ A) Expansion of equipment of the experimental farm for simulation of model applications for local conditions and those of other regions;

B) Fine-tuning and increasing adaptability of feasibility models fordifferent climatic, geographic an economic conditions through data from other similar approaches and the experimental farm.

Estimated funding needs: for A) 3 mill.Euro (4 yrs), for B) in several modules of 150.000 to 200.000 Euro for 2 years each

Promotion, training, education and assistance with local adaptation andestablishment of integrated systems in other regions Estimated funding needs: in two Central and Eastern European countries and two developing countries - 600.000 Euro for three years; expandable to other countriesand regions in modules of 150.000 Euro each
Project 2)
Integration of biodiversity conservation of insect fauna in agricultural practices and landscape management to assure sufficient crop and natural flora pollination;more concretely: crop and natural pollinator conservation throughagriculture and landscape management The SREN working group on Pollination has had preparatory publications and technical workshops; SREN is contributing to the global FAO initiative which is preparing a first meeting this fall for global coordination within the framework of the recommendations by the 5h Conference of the Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity A workshop, coordinated with the global initiative, to gather available European data, publish a resulting review, decide on the best thematic sector(s) with which to start, project preparation Estimated funding needs: 60.000 Euro for 1.5 years Training and specific studies in selected ecotypes and agro-systems, related totaxonomy, behaviour, and response to management practices, resulting in precise management (best practice) guidelines. Estimated funding needs: in several modules for different eco- and agro-systems of 300.000 Euro for three years each
Project 3)
Harmonisation and standardisation of research methods for organic agriculture for increased comparability and efficiency;more concretely: prepare a set of guidelines and facilitate implementation Two technical and one organisational workshop have already been held since 1998, co-financed by FAO, the Swiss Development Agency, the Swiss Research Institute for Organic Agriculture (FiBL) and the International Center for AdvancedMediterranean Agronomic Studies, Bari,Italy; at a total cost of approximately 60.000Euro One workshop and a preparatory study to gather more detailed data on subjects identified during the previous workshops; a second workshop to fine-tune the guidelines prepared as a result of the first workshop, publication (hardcopy, CD, internet).Estimated funding needs: 90.000 Eurofor three years Assistance to governments, national research institutions and farmers' associations with the implementation of these guidelines (policy advice, training, promotion) in a modular approach on a country or sub-regional basis in Central and EasternEuropean, Mediterranean and other non-European regions.Estimated funding needs: 50.000 to 300.000Euro each

line2.gif (403 bytes)

EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN OAT DISEASE NURSERY  

Coordinator: Dr. Josef Sebesta, DrSc. Assoc. Professor
Research Institute of Crop Production
Division of Plant Medicine
161 06 Prague 6, Ruzyn 507, Czech Republic
Tel. 02/33022468
Fax 02/33311592
E-mail: [email protected]

COUNTRY REPORTS
Dr. R.B. Clothier European and Mediterranenan Oat Disease Nursery 2000 - Results from the United Kingdom, Wales, Aberystwyth

 

PUBLICATION

J. Sebesta, H.W. Roderick, S. Stojanovi , B. Zwatz, Don E. Harder and Luciana Corazza:

GENETIC BASIS OF OAT RESISTANCE TO FUNGAL DISEASES. Plant Protection Science (Prague), 2000, Vol. 36, No. l: 23-38

 

COOPERATION IN THE EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN OAT DISEASE NURSERY IN 2000

In the year 2000 36 national cooperators in 23 countries were responsible for establishment of the EMODN trials (Table 1).

 

INCIDENCE OF OAT DISEASES IN EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST AND NORTHERN AFRICA IN 2000

Crown rust

In Europe, in the year 2000, high or moderate incidence of crown rust on oat was recorded in Austria, at the localities Drauhofen and St. Donat, in Estonia, at the locality Jogeva, in the United Kingdom, at the locality Aberystwyth, in Poland, at the locality Wielopole and in Russia, at the locality Petersburg.

In the Middle East, in Israel, at the locality Bet Dagan (near Tel Aviv) the incidence of crown rust was estimated as moderate one.

In Africa, in Morocco and Tunisia, high occurrence of crown rust was recorded at the localities Ghals and Mateur, respectively (Table 2).

 

Stem rust

In the year 2000, a high occurrence of oat stem rust was recorded in Russia, at the locality St. Petersburg and in Yugoslavia, at the locality Kragujevac.

 

Powdery mildew

In the year 2000, the powdery mildew on oat was heavily distributed in the United Kingdom, in Wales, at the locality Aberystwyth, in Latvia, at the locality Stende, and in Northern Africa, in Morocco, at the locality Ghals and in Tunisia, at the locality Mateur.

 

Septoria leaf blight and black stem

A moderate level of Septoria leaf blight and black stem severity was recorded in Austria, at the locality Drauhofen. The disease was also recorded in Belarus, at the locality Zhodino and in the Czech Republic, at the Prague-East locality.

 

Helminthosporium leaf blotch

Moderate or high levels of Helminthosporium leaf blotch were recorded in Austria, at the locality Drauhofen, in Latvia, at the locality Stende and in Russia, at the locality St. Petersburg.. Low level of the disease was indicated in Belarus, at the locality Zhodino, in the Czech Republic, at the locality PragueEast and in Tunisia, at the locality Mateur.

 

Barley yellow dwarf

Different levels of barley yellow dwarf virus were recorded in Belarus, at the locality Zhodino, in Latvia, at the locality Stende and in Russia, at the locality St. Petersburg.

In the Middle East, the BYDV was recorded in Israel, at the locality Bet Dagan (Tel-Aviv).

In Northern Africa, a high incidence of BYDV was recorded in Morocco, at the locality Ghals.

 

Crown rust resistance

In Austria, in the year 2000, the crown rust disease was evaluated at the localities Drauhofen and St. Donat. At the locality Drauhofe a clear resistance to crown rust was indicated in genotypes Pc 39, Pc 48, Pc 50, Pc 54-1, Pc 55, Pc 56, Pc 58, Pc 59, Pc 60, Pc 61, Pc 62, Pc 68, Pen 2 x CAV 1376 (C), KR 3813/73, Pirol and the line KR 288/73L/569 (CZ).

Of the sources of resistance to stem rust resistant to crown rust were Rodney A (Pg-2), Rodney B (Pg 4), Rodney M (Pg-13), Pg 15, Pg 16 and the line with combined stem rust resistance Rodney ABDH (Pg 1, 2, 4, 9).

Of the sources of tolerance to BYDV resistant to crown rust were IL 85-2069, IL 86-1158, IL 86-4189, IL 86-4467, IL 86-5698 and the line IL 86-6404.

Of the naked oats resistant to crown rust was the line OA 504-5 (PGR 12695)(C).

Of the supplemental cultivars a resistance to crown rust indicated lines (new releases) SG-K-961010 (CZ), Vermiou (G) and the Polish line POB 1429/93 (P).

In Estonia, at the locality Jogeva, free of crown rust were genotypes as follow: Pc 50-4, Pc 54-1, Pc 59, Pc 60, Pen 2 x CAV 1376 (C), IL 85-2069, IL 85-6467, IL 86-1158, IL 86-5698, OA 504-5 and the release POB 1429/93.

A good resistance to crown rust indicated oat genotypes as follow: Pc 39, Pc 48, Pc 58, Pc 61, Pc 68, KR 288/73L/569 (CZ), SG-K 95708 and the line IL 864189.

In the United Kingdom, at the locality Aberystwyth, under high infection pressure, free of crown rust infection were oats as follow: Pc 38, Pc 39, Pc 48, Pc 50, Pc 55, Pc 58, Pc 59, Pc 61, Pc 63, Pc 68, Garland, SG K 95708, IL 852069, OA 504-5 and the line POB 1429/93 (P). Furthermore, resistant were Pc 54-1, Pc 62, Pent x CAV 1376 (C), KR 3813/73, Rodney B, IL 86-1158, IL 865698 and the line IL 86-6404.

Very interesting data were obtained in Israel. Relatively resistant to Israeli culture # 19 and possibly to natural crown rust population were genotypes Pc 50, Pc 50-4, Pc 56, Pc 61, Pc 63, Pc 68, Pen 2 x CAV 1376 (C), Rodney B, Pg a, Rodney ABDH, Cc 6490, Roxton, IL 85-2069, IL 85-6467, IL 86-4467, IL 865698 and the cv. Vermiou (G).

In Russia, at the locality Petersburg, resistant to crown rust were genotypes as follow: Pc 50, Pc 50-2, Pc 50-4, Pc 54-2, Pc 56, Pc 58, Pc 59, Pc 60, Pc 61, Pc 63, Pc 64, Pc 67, KR 3813/73 (CZ), KR 288/73L/569 (CZ), Garland, Rodney A, Pg 15, Rodney ABDH, Cc 4146, Cc 4761, SG-K 95708, all the sources of tolerance to BYDV (IL lines), furthermore OA 503-1, OA 504-5, SG K 93682 (CZ), Vermiou, POB and the line 1429/93 (P).

In Morocco, at the locality Ghals, under high infection pressure resistant to crown rust were lines Pc 39, Pc 59, Czech release SG-K 95708 and the line IL 86-1158.

In Tunisia, at the locality Mateur, free of crown rust infection were Pc 38, Pc 39, Pc 48, Pc 50-4, Pc 54-1, Pc 55, Pc 62, Pc 63, Pc 68 and the line OA-504-5. Slightly infected were Pc 50, Pc 50-2, Pc 56, Pc 58, Pc 59, Pc 60, Pc 64, Pen2x CAV 1376 (C), KR 3813/73 (CZ), Pirol, IL 85-2069 and the line POB 1429/93.

At the locality Menzel Bourguiba, free of crown rust infection were Pc 38, Pc 39, Pc 50-2, Pc 54-1, Pc 56, Pc 59, Pc 63, Pc 68, Pent x CAV 1376 (C), Rodney H and the line Rodney ABDH. Slightly infected were Pc 48, Pc 58, Pc 62, KR 3813/73 (CZ), KR 288/73L/569 (CZ), Garland, Pg a, Manod, Cc 4146, SG K 95708, IL 86-4467, IL 86-5698, OA 504-5, SG K 93682 and the line POB 1429/93.

 

Stem rust resistance

In Russia, at the locality St. Petersburg„ slightly infected with stem rust were oats as follow: Pc 50, Pc 54-2, Pc 58, Pc 59, Pc 61, Pc 63, Pc 64, KR 3813/73, KR 288/73L/569, Rodney A, Pg 15, Rodney ABDH, Cc 4146, SG K 95708, all the sources of tolerance to BYDV with the exception of the line IL 86-6404, furthermore OA 503-1, OA 504-5, SG K 93682 and the cv. Vermiou.

In Yugoslavia, at the locality Kragujevac, free of stem rust infection were oats as follow: Pc 59, Pc 62, Pc 63, KR 288/73L/569, Rodney B, Rodney M, Pg a, Rodney ABDH, IL 85-2069, IL 86-5698, OA 504-5 and the Czech release SG K 961010. Furthermore, some resistance to stem rust was indicated in Pc 50, Pc 54-2, Pc 58, Pc 61, KR 3813/73, Pirol, Orlando, Melys, KR 9046, Adam, IL 861158, IL 86-4467, OA 503-1, OA 504-6, SG K 93682 and the Greek cv. Vermiou.

 

Powdery mildew resistance

In the United Kingdom, in Wales, at the locality Aberystwyth, mildew susceptible entries appeared to be more infected than in previous years.

Lines APR 122 and APR 166 remained completely free of mildew and only Pc 54-2, Cc 4761, Roxton and OM 1387 showed good levels of resistance at 25% leaf area infected (Clothier 2000).

In Morocco, at the locality Ghals, low levels of powdery mildew indicated KR 3813/73, KR 288/73L/569, Pg 15, Cc 6490, Cc 4761, Maelor, Maldwyn, Roxton, SG K 95708, Orlando, Melys, APR 122, APR 166, KR 8122, KR 9046, IL 85-6467, IL 86-1158, IL 86-4189 and the line IL 86-5698.

Furthermore, less infected with mildew were oats as follow: Pc 39, Pc 54-2, Pc 60, Pc 61, Pc 63, Pc 68, Pen 2 x CAV 1376, Pirol, Rodney H, Rodney M, Pg 16, Rodney ABDH, Manod, Mostyn, OM 1387, OM 1621, Adam, Zla ak, IL 852069, IL 86-6404 and the line OA 504-6.

In Tunisia, at the locality Mateur, free of mildew were oats as follow: Pc 54-2, Pc 60, Pc 61, Garland, Rodney B, Rodney H, Rodney M, Pg 16, Manod, Mostyn, Cc6490, Maelor, Maldwyn, Roxton, Orlando, Melys, OM 1387, OM 1621, APR 122 and the line APR 166.

Less infected with mildew were oats as follow: Pc 58, Pc 59, KR 3813/73, Cc 4761 and the line IL 85-2069.

 

Septoria leaf blight and black stem severity

In Austria, at the locality Drauhofen, relatively less infected with the disease were oats as follow: Pc 50, Pc 50-2, Pc 50-4, Pc 54-1, Pc 54-2, Pc 56, Pc 58, Pc 60, Pc 61, Pc 62, IL 86-1158, IL 86-4189 and the line IL 86-64-04.

 

Helminthosporium leaf blotch severity

In Austria, at the locality Drauhofen, relatively less infected with Helminthosporium were oats as follow: Pc 50, Pc 50-2, Pc 50-4, Pc 54-1, Pc 542, Pc 56, Pc 58, Pc 61, IL 86-1158, IL 86-4189 and the line IL 86-6404.

 

Barley yellow dwarf severity

In Belarus, at the locality Zhodino, free of BYDV infection were oats as follow: Pc 60, Pc 62, Pc 63, Rodney A, Rodney B, Rodney H, Rodney M, Pg 16, Pg a, Rodney ABDH, Manod, Cc 4146, Cc 4761, Roxton, SG K 95708, Orlando, APR 122, IL 85-6467, IL 86-1158, IL 86-4189, IL 86-4467, IL 86-6404, OA 503-1, SG K 961010, Vermiou, POB 1429/93 and the line POB 1491/93.

In Morocco, at the locality Ghals, under heavy infection pressure, relatively less infected with the disease were oat lines such as IL 85-6467,, IL 86-1158 and IL 86-4189.

Furthermore, slightly infected with BWDV were Pc 59, Pc 60, , IL 85-2069, IL 86-5698 and the line IL 86-6404.

 

 CONCLUSIONS

In Europe, in the year 2000, high or moderate incidence of crown rust on oat was recorded in Austria, Estonia, United Kingdom (Wales), Poland and in Russia. In the Middle East, in Israel, a moderate level of crown rust was recorded. In Northern Africa, high occurrence of crown on oat was recorded in Morocco and Tunisia. High occurrence of stem rust on oat was recorded in Russia and in Yugoslavia. Powdery mildew on oat in the year 2000 was heavily distributed in the United Kingdom (Wales) and Latvia, in Northern Africa, in Morocco and Tunisia. Septoria leaf blight and black stem was recorded in Austria, Belarus and in the Czech Republic. Helminthosporium leaf blotch was recorded in Austria, Latvia and Russia and, furthermore, was indicated in Belarus, Czechia and in Tunisia.

Barley yellow dwarf virus was recorded in Belarus, Latvia, Russia and Israel. As to resistance to crown rust, like in previous years, effectiveness indicated oats as follow: Pc 39, Pc 48, Pc 50, Pc 54-1, Pc 55, Pc 58, Pc 59, Pc 62, Pc 68, Pen 2 x CAV 1376 (C), KR 3813/73 CZ), KR 288/73L/569 (CZ), Rodney A (Pg 2), Rodney B (Pg 4), Rodney M (Pg 13), Pg 15, Pg 16, Rodney ABDH (Pg 1, 2, 4, 9). Furthermore, resistant to crown rust were IL 85-2069, IL 86-1158, IL 864189, IL 86-4467, IL 86-5698 and the line IL 86-6404. Of importance, indicated were also supplemental cultivars such as SG K 961010 (CZ), Vermiou (G) and the line POB 1429/93 (P). Against stem rust effective were oats as follow: KR 3813/73, KR 288/73L/569, Rodney A, Rodney B, Rodney ABDH, Pg 15, Pg a, SG K 95708, IL 85-2069, IL 86-5698, OA 504-5 and the Czech release SG K 961010. As to powdery mildew resistance, lines APR 122 and APR 166 remained completely free of mildew and only Pc 54-2, Cc 4761, Roxton and OM 1387 showed good levels of resistance at 25% leaf area infected. Furthermore, sources of adult plant resistance such as Maelor, Maldwyn, Roxton, Melys, OM 1387 and the line OM 1621 seem to be of constant effectiveness. Less infected with Septoria leaf blight and black stem were indicated oats as follow: Pc 50, Pc 50-2, Pc 50-4, Pc 54-1, Pc 54-2, Pc 56, Pc 58, Pc 60, Pc 61, Pc 62, IL 86-1158, IL 86-4189 and the line IL 86-6404. Relatively less infected with Helminthosporium leaf blotch were oats as follow: Pc 50, Pc 50-2, Pc 50-4, Pc 54-1, Pc 54-2, Pc 56, Pc 58, Pc 61, IL 86-1158, IL 864189 and the line 86-6404. As to the severity of BYDV, in Belarus, free of BYDV infection were oats as follow: Pc 60, Pc 62, Pc 63, Rodney A, Rodney B, Rodney H, Rodney M, Pg 16, Pg a, Rodney ABDH, Manod, Cc 4146, Cc 4761, Roxton, SG K 95708, Orlando APR 122, IL 85-6467, IL 86-1158, IL 86-4189, IL 86-4467, IL 86-6404, OA 503-1, SG K 961010, Vermiou, POB 1429/93 and the line POB 1491/93. In Morocco, under heavy infection pressure of BYDV, relatively less infected with the disease were oat lines such as IL 85-6467, IL 86-1158 and the line IL 86-4189.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Coordinator of the Project would like to express his gratitude and sincere thanks for friendly relationship and effective cooperation in the European and Mediterranean Oat Disease Nursery, especially to Hofrat Director Dr. Bruno Zwatz from the Federal Office and Research Centre for Agriculture, Institute for Phytomedicine in Vienna (Austria) and his co-worker, Ing. R. Zederbauer. The close and pleasant cooperation, lasting since 1969 up to now and considerable . help in preparation of the papers and the publication is very appreciated.

Furthermore, the friendship and kind help in preparation of papers and organisation and the work on the Project. of Drs. Ieuan T. Jones, Hywel W. Roderick and Roger B. Clothier from the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Aberystwyth, Wales, United Kingdom, is very acknowledged.

I would like to thank very much also to Dr. Don E. Harder, a close friend of mine, from the Cereal Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, for productive and agreeable cooperation, colleague relation and the linguistic help.

The valuable cooperation on the EMODN Project is very appreciated in Dr. Alla Shishlova (Belarus), Professor Dr. Nadya Antonova and Dr. Penka Momchilova (Bulgaria), Dr. F. Macha , Ing. J. a rvenka, Ing. Emilie e rvenkova, Ing. Marie Chourova and Ing. V. Chour (Czechia), Dr. M. Koppel (Estonia), Dr. Marketta Saastamoinen (Finland), Dr. Kurt Muller, Dr. M. Herrmann, Dr. H. Zimmermann, Dr. M. Sekler, Dr. Uwe Stephan and Dr. F. Stoiber (Germany), Dr. K. Bladenoupolos (Greece), Ing. T.E. Wouda (Holland), Dr. O. Veisz (Hungary), Dr. J. Manisterski (Israel), Dr. Luciana Corazza (Italy), Professor Dr. I. Rashal and Dr. Sanita Zute (Latvia), Dr. B. Ezzahiri and Dr. S. Saidi (Morocco), Dr. L. Reitan (Norway), Mgr. Ing. Andrzej Swierczewski, Mgr. Ing. J. Krolikowski and Mgr. Maria Halina Starzyk (Poland), Dr. I. Loskutov, Dr. E. Lyzlov and Dr. E. K. Yukhnina.(Russia), Ing. I. Longauer (Slovakia), Dr. J. Martin Lobo (Spain), Dr. B. Mattsson (Sweden), Dr. Mohamed B. Allagui (Tunisia), Professor Dr. S. Stojanovi and Dr. R. Jevti (Yugoslavia).

Special thanks belong to Ing. Jaroslav ervenka and Ing. Vlastimil Chour and their Teams from the Plant Breeding Station at Krukanice, for long-term lasting very productive and nice cooperation on genetic studies and the multiplication of the experimental materials.

 I would like to express my gratitude to the officers of FAO-Regional Office for Europe, Professors A. Bozzini, H. Olez and J. Boyazoglu, Drs. M. Lindau, R. Krell and Ms Isabel Alvarez for their interest, stimulation of the research and kind financial support of the EMODN Project.

My sincere thanks belong also to Mrs Adrianna Gabrielli, the Secretary to Dr. Krell, for her kindness and very promt information.

Table 1. National cooperators and countries in which the EMODN was established in 2000.

National cooperator Country
Hofrat Dr. B. Zwatz, Director Austria
Dr. Alla Shishlova Belarus
Dr. Nad a Antonova Bulgaria
Dr. Penka Momchilova Bulgaria
Dr. F. Macha Czechia
In g. Marie Chourova Czechia
Dr. J. Sebesta Czechia
Dr. M. Koppel Estonia
Dr. Marketta Saastamoinen Finland
Dr. M. Sekler German
Dr. M. Herrmann German
Dr. Uwe Stephan German
Dr. F. Stoiber German
Dr. H. Zimmermann German
Dr. R. Clothier Great Britain
Dr. K. Bladenou olos Greece
In g. T.E. Wouda Holland
Dr. O. Veisz Hungary
Dr. J. Manisterski Israel
Dr. Luciana Corazza Ital
Professor Dr. I. Rashal Latvia
Dr. Sanita Zute Latvia
Dr. B. Ezzahiri Morocco
Dr. S. Saidi Morocco
Dr. L. Reitan Norwa
Mgr. In g. J. Krohkowski Poland
Mgr. Maria Halina Star k Poland
Dr. I. Loskutov Russia
Dr. E. L zlov Russia
Dr. E.K. Yuknina Russia
In g. I. Lon auer Slovakia
Dr. J. Martin Lobo Spain
Dr. B. Mattsson Sweden
Dr. M. B. Alla ui Tunisia
Professor Dr. S. Stojanovi Yugoslavia
Dr. R. Jevti Yugoslavia

 

 

Table 2. Incidence (+ = low, ++ = moderate, +++ = high) of oat diseases in Europe in 2000 as found in the EMODN

Country Locality Pc Pg E Sa

He

BYDV
Austria Petzk.            
  Edelhof            
  Fuchsb.            
  Drauh. +++     ++

++

 
  St. Don. ++       +  
Belarus Zhodino +     + + +
Bulgaria Sadovo            
  Rousse            
Czechia Krom.            
  Krukan.            
  Pra-We            
  Pra-East            
Estonia Jogeva +++          
Finland Anttila            
German Freisin +          
  Schw. H            
  G. Lus.            
G.Brit. Aberyst +++   +++      
Hungary Martonv + +        
Israel Tel Aviv ++         +
Ital Rome            
Latvia Stende +   +++  

+++

 
Morocco Rabat            
  Ghals +++   +++     +++
  Koudia            
Norway Stjordal            
Poland Wielopo +++ + +      
  Strzelce            
  Kopasz.            
  Borow            
  Polanow            
Russia St.Peters +++ +++    

+++

+
Slovakia Pstrusa            
Sweden Svalov     +      
Tunisia Mateur +++   +++   +  
  M.Bour +++   +  

+++

 
Yugoslavia Kraguj.   +++        
  N. Sad            

line2.gif (403 bytes)

 

RELEVANT PARAGRAPHS OF ECA REPORTS ECA/99/REP

(part of the final report of the Thirty-first Session, 1999)

REVIEW OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE EUROPEAN SYSTEM OF COOPERATIVE RESEARCH NETWORKS IN AGRICULTURE (ESCORENA)

1.In reviewing the two documents submitted on this item, the Commission:

  • requested that the ESCORENA System be maintained and reinvigorated;
  • suggested that additional human and financial resources be allocated to the System but in view of the continuous budgetary constraints being faced by the Organisation, called upon Members to increase their support to the System;
  • welcomed the initiative to set up a new ESCORENA Website on Internet and recommended that resources be used in the future to further expand and optimise this system according to users' needs, particularly the interactive part, in close cooperation with all stakeholders;
  • endorsed the general recommendations for ESCORENA activities as presented in documents ECA:31/99(4) and ECA:31/99(5) and expressed particular support for paragraphs 14 and 27 in document ECA:31/99(5);
  • recommended exploring possibilities of linking ESCORENA with the emerging European Forum on Agricultural Research for Development;
  • raised the question of FAO's assistance in the establishment of a Subregional Agricultural Research Forum for Central and Eastern European countries.

2. With regard to document ECA:31/99(4), the Commission:

  • expressed support for the Olive, Nuts and SREN Networks; for the latter it particularly underlined the increasing importance of renewable energy in the context of rural development and sustainable resource management;
  • underlined also the need to improve reporting on the Networks' activities which would facilitate coordination, information dissemination, planning and evaluation;
  • called upon participating Members to identify a national focal point to liaise with the ESCORENA Secretariat.

 

ECA:31/99(4)

Part of Item 7: Review of the European System of Cooperative Research Networks in Agriculture (ESCORENA) by the European Networks Advisory Committee (ERNAC)

3. A second group presents a variety of problems which have to be more thoroughly analysed in order to seek appropriate solutions:

  • Interregional Cooperative Research Network on Cotton
  • improvement of scientific programmes
  • improvement of the management and simplification of its structure.
  • European Cooperative Research Network on Flax and Other Bast Fibre Plants
  • recentring activities in Europe
  • improving real concerted researches on flax
  • pertinent analysis on the opportunity to include hemp in the Network's activities.
  • Interregional Cooperative Research Network on Olives
  • FAO/REU should explore the opportunity and possibilities to involve the International Olive Oil Council (IOOC) in directly supporting the Network, still keeping it under the FAO aegis. Inter-coordination arrangements should also be discussed.
  • Interregional Cooperative Research Network on Nuts
  • Taking into consideration its complex structure, made up of nine subnetworks, more information is needed before any ERNAC recommendation on its future structure and orientation could be made. It would be desirable that an ERNAC member participates in a future meeting of the Network.
  • European Cooperative Research Network on Soybean
  • Given the decline in interest for the crop in Western Europe, but considering the new research emphasis on the dietary qualities of the product as a health food and given the important prevailing cooperation with different Eastern countries (Russia, Ukraine, Belarus), ERNAC proposes to determine whether the Network should be converted, or not, into an ad hoc research working group.
  • European Cooperative Research Network on Trace Elements, Natural Antioxidants and Other Contaminants in Foods and Diets
  • ERNAC while expressing appreciation for food quality and nutrition activities, also expresses concern on the orientation of the Network extensively towards medical issues. ERNAC needs supplementary information on the linkages with agricultural research.
  • Sustainable Rural Environment and Energy Network (SREN).

After four years of functioning of the structure consisting of six working groups, ERNAC proposes that given the present European research priorities, the following three working groups should be phased out:

  • Decentralised Energy Sources
  • Environmental Aspects of Anaerobic Treatments
  • Animal Traction.

Moreover, a clear cut three-year work plan should be presented by each of the following three working groups for ERNAC's consideration. The work plans should take into consideration current EU research priorities and initiatives.

  • Biomass for Energy and the Environment
  • Pollination and Pollinator Diversity Management
  • Research Methodologies in Organic Farming.

4. In a third group, given the inactivity observed during the last three years, ERNAC proposes

to phase out the Ad Hoc Research Group on Game Farming.

  1. Finally, it should be stressed again that a thorough evaluation of the Networks and working groups is needed but can only be carried out if ERNAC members are more personally involved and linked to the Networks' activities.

    ECA:31/99(5)

    Part of Item 7: Review of the European System of Cooperative Research Networks in Agriculture

    (ESCORENA) by the European Networks Advisory Committee (ERNAC)

    Cooperation with the Private Sector and Governmental Organisations

  2. The support in the EC and in the national research and technology programmes to the participation of small and medium enterprises (SME) in research projects, draws attention to their increasing role as partners in performing research and in transfer of technology. The presence of the private sector in ESCORENA is variable and related to the subject matter of the individual network. The ECA may consider recommending that individual networks be requested to increasingly explore the participation of the private sector and other tri- or multi-partite agreements to seek financial support.

 

Objective: To make ESCORENA more dynamic, attractive and efficient

Ideas noted during a first session trying to identify the targets and means/was to get there, tools that are available or need to be developed and who can do it)

 

 

TARGET BY USING TOOLS WHO
1. COMMUNICATION For Network visibility
• to government (local, national)
• to EU
• Media
• Science community
• users (extension, farmers, industry
• within FAO
• funding sources
• Focal points + REUS
• statistics
• concrete improvements as results
• special meetings, communication of results
• scientific publications, newsletters, booklets, manuals, guides
Reports (incl. projects conducted with network's involvement) websites, visits, press releases exhibitions, ESCORENA poster for exhibitions Copies to focal points and REUS FAO/Member
FAO + Coordinators
FAO + Member
For Network efficiency • within a network
• between networks
• between network and FAO/REU
• to science community
• to users
• to ERNAC
 • publications
• project preparation, formulation, execution
• experience sharing
(organisational, technical, political)
• Reporting, transparency, participation, technical involvement
• Efficient ERNAC, excellency
Webpage Self-evaluation webpage, electronic conferences FAO presence at meetings, web page Science evaluation tools, publications, meetings Booklets, manuals, guides ERNAC (participation, reports, recommendations)  REUS Secretariat REUS/Coordinators FAO, ERNAC,Networks
• to funding agencies (professional associations)
• to other networks


FAO-EU liaison office FAO, Coordinators
(reports, examples)
Knowledge transfer to:






• create tools for help to politicians
• Decision makers • strategy design
(governments) . methodology, development
• Scientists
• Trainers
• users, extension,
producers
• government and
private agencies
2. GEOGRAPHICAL EXPANSION
INTENSIFICATION (Systemic, Analytic)
CEE/CIS countries
EU plus accession
Near East/Mediterranean
Other continents
Target
Strategy
3. FINANCIAL RESOURCES 
Availability
Timely planning
Transparency
Records/statistics
• sources
• quantities
• in planning
• in records
• in reporting
• in accountabili
• of FAO contributions
• of Members' contributions
• of External contributions
0 of Gender and origin of participants
 Using project approach with budget, a. o.
4. PARTICIPATION in a network
Renovation
Funding
Private industry
Co-sponsors
FAO Technical Units
• ERNAC recommendations
• topics, outputs
• members
• structure/organisation
• self evaluation

As research partners and sponsors
• IGOs, NGOs
• professional associations
• private industry

 • to/through FAO
• direct/local formal and informal
b a network
cooperation in other mechanisms and fora EIARD, AARINEA
Inter-network collaboration  Objectives, activities, outputs
Topic/theme development
• by members
• by REUS/FAO
• by governments
• by ERNAC/ECA
• b Co-sponsors/ partners